BirdGut
Worth it · Narrative · 2019
The verdict
PLAY IT.
Worth it, and it costs nothing.
- Length
- 2h
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 95% positive
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, Radeon HD5450 or better; 256 MB or higher, 3.5 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
BirdGut is a hand-drawn 2d puzzle-platformer from the perspective of an outcast bee who gets eaten by a bird, and discovers that the bird's internal organs are not organs at all, but facilities in which the consumed insects are brainwashed and enslaved. Experience this bizarre one-man project for yourself.
What drives the score
How to read this
Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
- Player count is unknown. We assumed a small player base, about 500 owners.
The value story
Value puts it in the top 2 percent of the games it competes with. It is better reviewed than 98 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, 100 March Cats (free, scores 80) beats it on value, while it beats Dagon: by H. P. Lovecraft (free, scores 77).
4 players were online in it when we last checked, on Sep 27, 01:47 UTC.
Players
4 players online when we last checked, on Sep 27, 01:47 UTC.
Player counts from the Steam Web API.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
BirdGut scores 78/100 on the BANG Score (worth it) as of Oct 2, 2026. Player count is unknown, so the score assumes a small player base; Steam shows 5,204 reviews, so it has at least that many owners. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1072390/birdgutReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 26.
A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.