异化之恶〇Abnormal Treatment
BANGER · RPG · 2019
The verdict
PLAY IT.
A BANGER, and it costs nothing.
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 97% positive
Minimum on the Steam store: 512 MB of memory, Intel HD 630, 205 MB of storage. Windows only.
Strange events occur at a sanatorium for those with unusual abilities. Follow clues, solve puzzles, and uncover the truth. What will be released when all secrets are revealed? Goodness? Or… pure ”EVIL”?
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
Value puts it in the top 1 percent of the games it competes with. It is better reviewed than 99 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Grimm's Hollow (free, scores 93) beats it on value, while it beats Finding Paradise ($9.99, scores 89).
Steam's global achievement data puts about 8 percent of players at this game's ending achievement.
It is still busy. 4 players were in it at once at the last check, across 81 days of tracking.
The drop-off
47% start to 8% finishMost players never reach the end. Steam global achievements
Players
4 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
异化之恶〇Abnormal Treatment scores 91/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1122750/abnormal-treatmentThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 1.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.