NARAKA: BLADEPOINT
Skip · Multiplayer · 2021
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The reviews do not carry it. What it costs you is time.
- PriceS
- Free to play
- Reviews▼
- 73% of 303,566
- Genre rank
- Top 38% Multiplayer
Holding it back: Monetization, Recent reviews
Recent reviews trending down: 62% over the last 30 days against 73% all-time.
Time and effort
- Typical playtime
- 21.7h
- To 100%
- 118.5h 5.5x the story
- Achievements
- 40
Players and genre
- Online
- 4,929 now
- Recent reviews
- 62% 30 days
- Better reviewed
- 56% of its genre
Price and player charts
The drop-off
67% start to 7% rarestA game like this has no single ending, so its score does not use the finish rate. The curve shows where players stop. Steam global achievements
The value story
The value story
Its score sits in the top 38 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Super Animal Royale (free, scores 82) beats it on value, while it beats 武侠乂 The Swordsmen X ($24.99, scores 0).
It is still busy. 4.9K players were online when we last checked, on Nov 4, 21:45 UTC, across 35 days of weekly checks. Free to start. PCGamingWiki lists loot boxes in it, the aggressive kind of in-app purchase.
More about NARAKA: BLADEPOINT
Players rate it 73 percent positive over its lifetime, but the last 30 days run 62 percent. Something recent has soured the room. Inside the two-hour refund window, 57 percent of the 4,854 reviews written there were positive, against 73 percent overall, and those are 3 percent of everything written about it. It carries the aggressive kind of in-app purchases, and the score already docks it for that.
HowLongToBeat players log 21.7 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 119, 5.5 times as much.
The rating rests on 303,566 reviews, so it is not going to move much from here.
Buy now or wait
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
What players say
After almost 250 hours on this game I've concluded the following: - 1) THE GAME IS IN DIRE NEED OF A DEDICATED 1V1 GAME MODE - The current "lobby" 1v1 game mode is very slow and bottle necked due to its current structure. The current structure forces players trying to do a 1v1 battle to just sit there and watch as the whole lobby franticly fights to be next in que, waiting around 1 stone statue to be next in line. A...
2 more reviews, 1 not recommended
A truly amazing masterpiece. From battle royal mode to showdowns, everything is interesting. Many characters to choose from and many different gameplay modes. The game also has many limited time events. A must try.
Since they add Champion Fight they kill the game ... remove this thing and I might gove positive review
Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
About the game
Dive into the legends of the Far East in NARAKA: BLADEPOINT; team up with friends in fast-paced melee fights for a Battle Royale experience unlike any other. Find your playstyle with a varied cast of heroes with unique skills. More than 40 million players have already joined the fray, play free now!
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750TI, Intel Arc A380, AMD HD 6950 or equivalent, 90 GB of storage. Windows only.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
NARAKA: BLADEPOINT scores 33/100 on the BANG Score (a skip) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1203220/naraka-bladepointReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Nov 3. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.