
Walking Simulator
Worth it · Strategy · 2020
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
PLAY IT.
Worth it, and it costs nothing.
- Length
- 1.9h
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 88% positive
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, GTX 750, 3 GB of storage. Windows only.
The year is 2020, world war III destroyed the civilized world. You are the last post carrier, tasked to get parcels from point A to B in the most barren and desolate places on earth.
What drives the score
How to read this
Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
The value story
Value puts it in the top 3 percent of the games it competes with. It is better reviewed than 93 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Moonbase Alpha (free, scores 79) beats it on value, while it beats The Backrooms Game FREE Edition (free, scores 53).
Steam's global achievement data puts 21 percent of players at this game's ending achievement. The median game this site can measure sits at 15.
1.9 hours to finish it, 5 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 2.4 times the campaign.
2 players were online in it when we last checked, on Sep 29, 15:47 UTC.
The drop-off
68% start to 21% finishSteam counts a larger share of its players at the ending achievement than it does for most games this site can measure. Steam global achievements
Players
2 players online when we last checked, on Sep 29, 15:47 UTC.
Player counts from the Steam Web API.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Walking Simulator scores 72/100 on the BANG Score (worth it) as of Oct 2, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1214280/walking-simulatorReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 26.
A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.
