Attack on Toys
Fair · RPG · 2021 · Early Access
The verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $6.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Reviews
- 93% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Attack on Toys is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT, 2 GB of storage. Windows only.
Relive Your Childhood Toys comes to life! Build your Army Toys, make battle scenario, watch the Toys battling each other, and customize your play with Attack on Toys Toy Box. Command your Army Toys to fight againts another toys strategically and keep them alive during battle!
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
- How long it takes to beat isn't in our data. We scored it as a typical RPG game (about 8 hours) and docked the score for the missing length.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $4.89, set in September 2021. 12 discounts in the 5 years on record. They run about 30 percent off, roughly 25 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 14 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 25 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 4 percent on value. It is better reviewed than 96 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Mister Furry: Hot Muscles ($0.99, scores 69) beats it on value, while it beats Tinkerlands ($12.99, scores 49).
1 of the 379 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here comes from a buyer who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written September 2021 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 73 percent of the 142 reviews written there were positive, against 93 percent overall, and those are 12 percent of everything written about it.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Attack on Toys scores 67/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). Length is estimated at 8 hours, not measured, so the score is docked. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1269690/attack-on-toysThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.