Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
Skip · Shooter · 2022
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $29.99.
- Length
- 16.1h
- Value
- $1.86/hr
- Reviews
- 71% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Tiny Tina's Wonderlands is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 6 GB of memory, AMD Radeon RX470 (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 4GB), 75 GB of storage. Windows only.
Embark on an epic adventure full of whimsy, wonder, and high-powered weaponry! Roll your own multiclass hero then shoot, loot, slash, and cast on a quest to stop the Dragon Lord.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $5.99, set in March 2026. 39 discounts in the 4 years on record. They run about 75 percent off, roughly 6 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 4 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 6 weeks.
It is pricier than 86 percent of its genre, and less well reviewed than 68 percent. On the same math Borderlands 3 ($5.99, scores 59) and Borderlands Game of the Year ($29.99, scores 71) are the better buys, and they are the games it most resembles.
5 of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written June 2025 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 40 percent of the 1,096 reviews written there were positive, against 71 percent overall, and those are 6 percent of everything written about it.
16.1 hours to finish it, 52 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 3.2 times the campaign.
4 years after release it still had 866 people in it at once.
It carries Valve's Deck Verified rating, which is the one that means it just works.
The drop-off
92% start to 2% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
866 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Story feels a bit short, endgame is running the same dungeons over and over (boring), not all the writing is that great.. the game was definitely rushed. But overall it's still pretty good despite these shortcomings. Classes are fun to mix and match, gunplay is solid. Visually my favorite in the series and the fantasy theme is great. A lot of the humor lands and isn't (quite) as cringe like in BL3. Worth getting on...
Very good, if the bundle goes on sale, might buy it for the DLCs, as I should have done originally.
Honestly it was just boring, the most fun we had was the first hour when the game was still fresh. too bad the same cycle just repeats throughout the entirety of the game. Beat the game in 2 days on the hardest difficulty and being 7 levels under leveled.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands scores 25/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1286680/tiny-tina-s-wonderlandsThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 15, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.