Expedition Agartha
Skip · Multiplayer · 2023
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The reviews do not carry it. What it costs you is time.
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 63% of 1,766 positive
What drives the score
How to read this
Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
About the game
Expedition Agartha is a high-stakes first person slasher. Loot ancient treasures, conquer mythological enemies, and extract to safety - alone or up to groups of three. Gear up and launch your expedition in the first and only medieval extraction looter available on Steam!
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, Nvidia GeForce GTX 560 (1GB) or AMD Radeon HD 7770 (1GB), 20 GB of storage. Windows only.
The value story
It is less well reviewed than 83 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Path of Exile (free, scores 75) beats it on value, while it beats Reign of Guilds (free, scores 7).
It is still busy. 2 players were online when we last checked, on Oct 16, 23:49 UTC, across 21 days of weekly checks.
More about Expedition Agartha
Inside the two-hour refund window, 44 percent of the 122 reviews written there were positive, against 63 percent overall, and those are 27 percent of everything written about it.
The drop-off
54% start to 2% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
No data upstream: length (HowLongToBeat), critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Expedition Agartha scores 11/100 on the BANG Score (a skip) as of Oct 19, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1552620/expedition-agarthaReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 27. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.