
Ravenous Devils
BANGER · Strategy · 2022
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
BUY IT.
A BANGER at $4.99.
- Length
- 4.7h
- Value
- $1.06/hr
- Reviews
- 93% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Ravenous Devils is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, Nvidia GeForce 750, 2 GB of storage. Windows only.
A horror cooking simulator where the secret ingredient is crime. Improve your shops, buy new tools, expand your menu, and above all, make your customers happy.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
October 2024 is where it bottomed out, at $2.24. It has been discounted 25 times in the 4 years tracked here, typically at 30 percent off, with about 9 weeks between sales. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 4 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 9 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 1 percent on value. It is cheaper than 64 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 97 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Barotrauma ($17.49, scores 92) beats it on value, while it beats Cooking Simulator ($19.99, scores 55).
The math says it holds its tier up to $7.78, and you are being asked for $4.99.
Steam's global achievement data puts 42 percent of players at this game's ending achievement. The median game this site can measure sits at 8. Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 10 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written May 2022 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 76 percent of the 733 reviews written there were positive, against 93 percent overall, and those are 8 percent of everything written about it.
It carries Valve's Deck Verified rating and runs 4.7 hours, about as long as a handheld game wants to be.
The drop-off
84% start to 42% finishPeople genuinely stick with this one. Steam global achievements
Players
25 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Love the fact we're forcing innocent people to commit cannibalism while trying to not get caught, super dark and I love that it's set in the 1800s
You play as a cute married couple running their own business 🥩 Cooking animations, voice acting, cute music ❤️ The gameplay is really addictive, I definitely recommend it! Those 7-8 hours will fly by!
I really like the game because it reminds me of Sweeney Todd. There's just a minor bug that occurred while I was playing, especially during Hildred's part. When I click on where she has to be, she doesn't move, but when I try Percival's parts, everything works fine. I have to quit the game and open it again for it to work. I'm still not done playing, but overall, it's a really great game!
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Ravenous Devils scores 90/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1615290/ravenous-devilsThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.