GWENT: Rogue Mage (Single-Player Expansion)

GWENT: Rogue Mage (Single-Player Expansion)

Skip · Roguelike · 2022

Steam Deck Unsupported

The verdict

SKIP IT.

It scores 0, under the fair line, at $1.99.

Length
10.5h
Value
$0.19/hr
Reviews
54% positive
Reviews or length hold it below the tiers even at a deep discount.

Buy now or wait

The Autumn Sale is on until Oct 8. It is 80% off today.

Discounted in each of its last 8 seasonal sales on record.

Typical seasonal cut
70% ($2.99)

Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.

Watch this gameOne alert when it is worth buying.
Length
10.5h
typical playtime (HowLongToBeat)
Completionist
48.3h
100% (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
$0.19
price ÷ typical playtime
Price
$1.99
as of Oct 1
Reviews
54%
1,295 reviews, as of Sep 27
Players
350K
owners, SteamSpy estimate
Released
2022

Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | Radeon R7 240. Windows only.

GWENT: Rogue Mage is a first single-player expansion to GWENT: The Witcher Card Game. It combines elements of roguelike, deckbuilding, and strategy games with GWENT card battles.
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work

What we assumed
  • Steam lists in-app purchases but we have no detail on them. Small caution applied.
Holding it back
Reviews54% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones Scored as 55% after the small-sample adjustment
Reach350K+ owners
How many own it and play it, by SteamSpy's estimates (an old snapshot), the biggest driver for a game with no ending
MonetizationIn-app purchases
Steam lists in-app purchases and nothing more is known, so a small haircut
For context
Value$0.19/hr
Price per hour of game. This genre scores on player counts instead That is today's sale price. Normally $0.95/hr
Length11 hours
Typical playtime on HowLongToBeat. Endless games score on players, so hours stay out of it
Refunds9 of 800 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked
AI contentNone disclosed
From the developer's own Steam disclosure. No disclosure is not proof of none, so it does not move the score

The value story

The lowest price on record is $1.99, set in September 2026. 37 discounts in the 4 years on record. They run about 60 percent off, roughly 6 weeks apart. Today's $1.99 at 80 percent off matches the lowest price in the record.

It is cheaper than 61 percent of its genre, and less well reviewed than 98 percent. On the same math Trials of Fire ($19.99, scores 64) and Nowhere Prophet ($6.24, scores 26) are the better buys, and they are the games it most resembles.

This site sampled 800 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 9 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written July 2022 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 46 percent of the 213 reviews written there were positive, against 54 percent overall, and those are 17 percent of everything written about it.

HowLongToBeat players log 10.5 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 48, 4.6 times as much.

The drop-off

92% start to 6% finish
050100rarestfirst achievement

A game like this has no single ending, so its score does not use the finish rate. The curve shows where players stop. Steam global achievements

Players

15 players online when we last checked, on Sep 28, 22:50 UTC.

Player counts from the Steam Web API.

What players say

Tried it on the cheap but it's very much a flawed game. The original Gwent is about card advantage, three lanes and three rounds, knowing when to pass for tempo and when to commit. This game removes exactly all of that, and replaces it with insane RNG. The worst part is you have this persistent resource (mana) across battles but you have no idea when to expend it because 1. you can only cast one spell per turn and...
VickNot recommendedafter 2.2hAug 2026Read on Steam
I love Gwent, but I think the developers ran out of budget after first cutscene. Most of the cutscene are just a JPEG-style image with quest banners, and they read walls of text like that? It gives me Risk of Rain vibes with its map layout, but with fewer events, very little player choice, and Only 3 bosses (IDK it have secret boss or not). Overall, Thronebreaker and Gwent Multiplayer are still much more fun than...
DIONot recommendedafter 16hJul 2026Read on Steam
--- ✦ 𝓡𝓮𝓬𝓸𝓶𝓶𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓭 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓻𝓲𝓰𝓱𝓽 𝓰𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓹 ✦ One run was enough for me. ༺━━━✦━━━༻ ✦ Not every Witcher game is for every Witcher fan ✦ ◆ Rogue Mage simply didn't click with me. I love The Witcher universe, so naturally I wanted to give this one a try. Unfortunately, after completing just one run, I already knew I probably wasn't going to come back. ༺━━━✦━━━༻ ✦ Not a game for me ✦ ◆ The only version of Gwent I truly...
GandalfCzarnyRecommendedafter 1.6h1 found this helpfulRead on Steam

Steam reviews, mixed to match its Steam ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.

No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).

Cite this score

BANG Score badge
GWENT: Rogue Mage (Single-Player Expansion) scores 0/100 on the BANG Score (a skip) as of Oct 2, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1711950/gwent-rogue-mage-single-player-expansion
Embed the live badge

Reviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 27, price as of Oct 1.

A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.

Tags

Steam user tags as SteamSpy recorded them

Details

DeveloperCD PROJEKT RED
PublisherCD PROJEKT RED
GenreRoguelike
Released2022
Achievements45