Drunken Robot Pornography
Skip · Shooter · 2014
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $14.99.
- Length
- 4.2h
- Value
- $3.57/hr
- Reviews
- 84% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Drunken Robot Pornography is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, 512MB 3D Card, Shader Model 3, 2 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, Linux.
Bullet-hell, boss-battle, first-person shooter, with giant-robots, martinis and jetpacks. YES. Drink the cocktails. Fight the titans. Make your own Titans. Drink your friend's cocktails.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $2.24. That was December 2017. It has been discounted 45 times in the 13 years tracked here, typically at 75 percent off, with about 11 weeks between sales.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 38 percent on value. It is pricier than 65 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 66 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Devil Daggers ($9.99, scores 78) beats it on value, while it beats BrainBread 2 (free, scores 37).
Critics scored it 66. Players sit 18 points higher at 84 percent, which usually means a game that plays better than it reviews.
Steam's global achievement data says about 3 percent of players ever finish it. On a 4.2-hour game, that is a lot of paid-for hours most people never see. Inside the two-hour refund window, 77 percent of the 234 reviews written there were positive, against 84 percent overall, and those are 48 percent of everything written about it.
The drop-off
89% start to 3% finishMost players never reach the end. On a 4.2-hour game, that's a lot you pay for and may never use. Steam global achievements
What players say
Hey hey hey hey hey heyyy... dont get the wrong idea guys. Its not what you think.
Drunken Robot Pornography: A Chaotic Giant Robot Bullet Hell That's Rated E for Everyone! When you first hear about a game named Drunken Robot Pornography (DRP), you might wonder what to expect. The game indeed revolves around one of gaming's classic tropes: epic giant robot boss battles, although not in the way you might initially imagine. In DRP, the levels are individual, self-contained challenges in a...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Drunken Robot Pornography scores 49/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/209060/drunken-robot-pornographyThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 6, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.