Sang-Froid - Tales of Werewolves
Worth it · RPG · 2013
Steam Deck UnsupportedThe verdict
PLAY IT.
Worth it at free.
- Length
- 8.8h
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 88% positive
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, nVidia GeForce 9 series or better or ATI HD4000 series or better., 4 GB of storage. Windows only.
Combining action and strategy in a unique way, Sang-Froid: Tales of Werewolves transports you into an epic folktale co-written with best-selling Canadian author Bryan Perro (Amos Daragon, Wariwulf), in which two feuding brothers will have to put aside their differences to save their sister, who is pursued by the Devil himself!
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
On value it sits in the top 3 percent of its genre. It is better reviewed than 90 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Orcs Must Die! 2 ($3.74, scores 89) beats it on value, while it beats The Dungeon Of Naheulbeuk: The Amulet Of Chaos ($34.99, scores 70).
79 from critics against 88 percent from players, and the player number comes from people who own the game.
Inside the two-hour refund window, 76 percent of the 307 reviews written there were positive, against 88 percent overall, and those are 24 percent of everything written about it.
Finishing takes 8.8 hours; clearing it takes 24, which is 2.7 times the campaign.
The drop-off
59% start to 5% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
What players say
Игра "Sang-Froid - Tales of Werewolves" предлагает атмосферный сюжет в жанре волшебства и мистики. Погружение в мир волков-людоедов с элементами драмы и моральных дилемм захватывающее. Геймплей сочетает исследование, бои и выбор решений, влияющих на развитие сюжета. Графика выполнена в стиле мрачного фэнтези, а звуковое сопровождение усиливает напряжение. Однако сложная система управления и не всегда логичные...
Sang-Froid: Tales of Werewolves - A Review Sang Froid provides us a fun tower defense meets werewolves and wendigos gameplay experience. Playing as either of two brothers, you must protect your home from varying waves of nighttime packs of wolves and monsters with increasing difficulty as the nights progress. You get to create your own traps, ways of navigating the map, and can play a part in defending your base by...
This isn't my type of game. Nothing wrong with it, but it could control a bit better. The setting and ambience are excellent, but just not the best controls for this kind of game. I recommend Orcs Must Die if you want better playability.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Sang-Froid - Tales of Werewolves scores 71/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/227220/sang-froid-tales-of-werewolvesThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 6.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.