STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection
Skip · Action · 2024
The verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $35.01.
- Length
- 8.1h
- Value
- $4.32/hr
- Reviews
- 24% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, 2GB GTX 750, 50 GB of storage. Windows only.
Play the classic STAR WARS™ Battlefront games, online and offline in this definitive collection.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
April 2025 is where it bottomed out, at $26.25. It has been discounted 16 times in the 3 years tracked here, typically at 25 percent off, with about 7 weeks between sales. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 4 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 7 weeks.
It is pricier than 98 percent of its genre, and less well reviewed than 99 percent. The games it most resembles do better on the same math. STAR WARS™: Bounty Hunter™ ($19.99, scores 34) and Tomb Raider IV-VI Remastered ($29.99, scores 45) both outscore it.
Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 172 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written April 2024 to August 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 9 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and none of the 3,221 games in its genre sampled this deeply has a larger share. The typical game sits near 5 in 1,000, so the score docks it. 13 of the 172 refunded reviewers were past Valve's two-hour window when they wrote the review. Inside the two-hour refund window, 12 percent of the 4,993 reviews written there were positive, against 24 percent overall, and those are 70 percent of everything written about it.
Finishing takes 8.1 hours; clearing it takes 26, which is 3.2 times the campaign.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
STAR WARS™: Battlefront Classic Collection scores 0/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2446550/star-wars-battlefront-classic-collectionThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 3, price as of Sep 23.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.