
Mouthwashing
Worth it · Narrative · 2024
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $12.99, a BANGER if it drops to $6.06.
- Length
- 2.5h
- Value
- $5.20/hr
- Reviews
- 95% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Mouthwashing is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, GTX 560, 3 GB of storage. Windows only.
The five crew members of the Tulpar are stranded in the empty reaches of space, shrouded in perpetual sunset. God is not watching.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
June 2026 is where it bottomed out, at $7.79. 19 discounts in the 2 years on record. They run about 30 percent off, roughly 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 5 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 5 weeks. No sale on record has reached $6.06, the price it would take to be a BANGER.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 3 percent on value. It is pricier than 73 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 98 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Fran Bow ($14.99, scores 83) beats it on value, while it beats The Medium ($49.99, scores 46).
Steam's global achievement data says about 14 percent of players ever finish it. On a 2.5-hour game, that is a lot of paid-for hours most people never see. 20 of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written July 2025 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 89 percent of the 2,578 reviews written there were positive, against 95 percent overall, and those are 8 percent of everything written about it.
It carries Valve's Deck Verified rating and runs 2.5 hours, about as long as a handheld game wants to be.
The drop-off
99% start to 14% finishA normal fall-off for a game this long. Steam global achievements
Players
69 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
I knew this would be a game I would love ever since I saw it being teased in How Fish Is Made. I put off playing it for a long time for that reason. I didn't want to lose the option of playing it for the first time, for the first time. Now that I have I am satisfied that it lived up to the hype I bestowed upon it. This game and No, I'm Not Human are perfect games in the horror genre that I love so much. :) Amazing...
Mouthwashing is a masterpiece of modern indie horror! A great spin on classic sci-fi horror: no aliens, no evil technology. It's almost a paradoxical kind of horror, with sci-fi as its setting, while the only horror is human. It is also an example of in medias res and nonlinear storytelling done well in gaming. It's not easy to make a nonlinear narrative, but Mouthwashing makes its back-and-forth storytelling feel...
This would have to be the most overrated game I've played in a long while. As long as the story is progressing it's okay, I could get into the psycho-drama, but there are so many sequences, especially towards the end, that aren't particularly scary or meaningful, they're really just tedious. There are so many lingering, empty visuals, and mechanics in search of a plot, and by the end the game just starts to run in...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Mouthwashing scores 71/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2475490/mouthwashingThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 23.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.