Super Amazing Wagon Adventure

Super Amazing Wagon Adventure

Worth it · Roguelike · 2013

The verdict

BUY IT.

Worth it at $2.99.

Reviews
95% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.

Get one email when Super Amazing Wagon Adventure is worth buying.

One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.

Price
$2.99
as of Sep 24
Reviews
95%
1,927 reviews, as of Aug 2
Players
10K
owners (estimate)
Released
2013
Length + $/hr
No data
no length in our data yet

Minimum on the Steam store: 1 GB of memory, Shader Model 2.0, 61 MB of storage. Windows only.

Super Amazing Wagon Adventure is a fast-paced 2d shooting game with a random story. You control a group of three migrants traveling west along a wagon trail. The game consists of short scenes that are sequenced together in a semi-random way to tell a crazy adventure story.
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

Raising the score
Reviews95% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
Holding it back
Reach10K+ players
How many own it and play it, the biggest driver for a game with no ending
For context
MonetizationNot known
No monetization record for this game, so nothing is assumed either way
Refunds1 of 227 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked

The value story

The lowest price on record is $1.01, set in November 2018. It has been discounted 28 times in the 13 years tracked here, typically at 50 percent off, with about 13 weeks between sales. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 13 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 13 weeks.

Value puts it in the top 16 percent of the games it competes with. It is cheaper than 90 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 93 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Nuclear Throne ($11.99, scores 88) beats it on value, while it beats Juicy Realm ($9.99, scores 69).

1 of the 227 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here comes from a buyer who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to July 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 94 percent of the 869 reviews written there were positive, against 95 percent overall, and those are 53 percent of everything written about it.

Players

1 players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

Super Amazing Wagon Adventure scores 76/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/250500/super-amazing-wagon-adventure
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/250500/super-amazing-wagon-adventure"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/250500" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/250500)](https://steambangers.com/game/250500/super-amazing-wagon-adventure)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 24.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.