Rust

Rust

Worth it · Multiplayer · 2018

Steam Deck Unsupported

The verdict

BUY IT.

Worth it at $19.99.

Length
30h
Value
$0.67/hr
Reviews
87% positive
It will not reach BANGER at any price.
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.

Get one email when Rust is worth buying.

One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.

Length
30h
typical playtime (HowLongToBeat)
Completionist
116.7h
100% (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
$0.67
price ÷ typical playtime
Price
$19.99
as of Sep 24
Reviews
87%
1,395,882 reviews, as of Sep 4
Metacritic
69
critic score
Players
35.0M
owners (estimate)
Released
2018

Minimum on the Steam store: 12 GB of memory, AMD Radeon RX 470, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060, Intel Arc A580, 45 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.

The only aim in Rust is to survive. Everything wants you to die - the island’s wildlife, other inhabitants, the environment, and other survivors. Do whatever it takes to last another night.
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

Raising the score
Reach35M+ players
How many own it and play it, the biggest driver for a game with no ending
Holding it back
Reviews87% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
MonetizationCosmetic, Player trading
Paid extras, but no loot boxes or currency. A light touch
For context
Value$0.67/hr
Price per hour of game. This genre scores on player counts instead That is today's sale price. Normally $1.33/hr
Length30 hours
Typical playtime on HowLongToBeat. Endless games score on players, so hours stay out of it
Refunds9 of 800 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked

The value story

June 2018 is where it bottomed out, at $8.74. It has been discounted 67 times in the 13 years tracked here, typically at 50 percent off, with about 6 weeks between sales. Today's $19.99 at 50 percent off still sits 129 percent above the floor, so a deeper cut exists in its history.

On value it sits in the top 3 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 99 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 93 percent. Among the games closest to it, SURVIVAL: Postapocalypse Now ($14.99, scores 1) and Out of Reach ($14.99, scores 2) both come in lower.

69 from critics against 87 percent from players, and the player number comes from people who own the game.

Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 9 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written August 2026 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 57 percent of the 31,655 reviews written there were positive, against 87 percent overall, and those are 3 percent of everything written about it. It sells extras on top of the sticker price (cosmetic, player trading); the score docks it lightly for that.

HowLongToBeat players log 30 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 117, 3.9 times as much.

Still 143.9K concurrent players, 8 years in.

In-app purchasesCosmetic, Player tradingPCGamingWiki

The drop-off

73% start to <1% rarest
050100rarestfirst achievement

No achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements

Players

144K players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

What players say

Still full of cheaters. I don't get why people even try to play, if you wanna deal with kids screaming the nword every 2 seconds and getting headshot 300 meters away every spawn play this game!
TrickyNot recommendedafter 797h11 found this helpfulRead on Steam
This game has to be the biggest waste of money I ever saw. The graphics are pretty good and the survival gameplay mechanics are fine, but I DO NOT recommend this game for anyone. The reason is the "community" who plays the game. Unlike MOST Multiplayer games such as Red Dead Online where the community is for the most part aside from some toxic people filled with decent folks, Rust is EXACTLY the opposite. The Rust...
NinedalorianNot recommendedafter 124h19 found this helpfulRead on Steam
Rust is not a survival game. It is a psychological experiment disguised as a video game. You spawn on a beach with absolutely nothing. No weapons. No clothes. No idea what you're doing. Five minutes later, some naked guy named xX_DeathDaddy_Xx has hit you in the head with a rock, stolen your hemp, and somehow built a mansion next to your corpse. The game begins peacefully. You collect wood. You mine some stone. You...
Girth QuakeRecommendedafter 456h85 found this helpfulRead on Steam

Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

Rust scores 72/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/252490/rust
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/252490/rust"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/252490" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/252490)](https://steambangers.com/game/252490/rust)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 4, price as of Sep 24.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.

Critics vs players+18
Critics
69
Players
87
Player favorite. The critics underrated it.
Metacritic critics · 1,395,882 Steam player reviews

Tags

Details

DeveloperFacepunch Studios
PublisherFacepunch Studios
GenreMultiplayer
Released2018
Achievements105