
100 Asian Cats
Worth it · RPG · 2023
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
PLAY IT.
Worth it, and it costs nothing.
- Length
- 0.2h
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 97% positive
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, 512MB +, 1 GB of storage. Windows only.
🏮🐈 100 Asian Cats - Join the cutest adventure in the Asia! 😻 🌸 Explore the charming hand-drawn artwork of Asian temples 🏯 as you embark on a quest to find 100 adorable cats hidden throughout the game. 🕵️♂️❌ Can you find them all? 🕵️♂️🐈✅
What drives the score
How to read this
Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
- Player count is unknown. We assumed a small player base, about 500 owners.
- Steam lists in-app purchases but we have no detail on them. Small caution applied.
The value story
On value it sits in the top 2 percent of its genre. It is better reviewed than 99 percent of its genre. Among the games closest to it, 100 Korea Cats (free, scores 74) and 100 Space Cats (free, scores 25) both come in lower.
3 players were online in it when we last checked, on Oct 1, 19:47 UTC.
The drop-off
90% start to 87% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
3 players online when we last checked, on Oct 1, 19:47 UTC.
Player counts from the Steam Web API.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
100 Asian Cats scores 79/100 on the BANG Score (worth it) as of Oct 2, 2026. Player count is unknown, so the score assumes a small player base; Steam shows 8,606 reviews, so it has at least that many owners. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2667970/100-asian-catsReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 26.
A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.
