WEBFISHING

WEBFISHING

BANGER · Short indie · 2024

Steam Deck Playable

The verdict

BUY IT.

A BANGER at $4.99.

Length
14.3h
Value
$0.35/hr
Reviews
97% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.

Get one email when WEBFISHING is worth buying.

One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.

Length
14.3h
main story (HowLongToBeat)
Completionist
164.7h
100% (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
$0.35
price ÷ main-story length
Price
$4.99
as of Sep 23
Reviews
97%
70,428 reviews, as of Sep 15
Players
1.5M
owners (estimate)
Released
2024

Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, GTX 580, 4 GB of storage. Windows only.

WEBFISHING a multiplayer chatroom-focused fishing game! Relax and fish (on the web!)
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

Raising the score
Value$0.35/hr
Price per hour of game. It moves the score inside the ceiling reviews set
Reviews97% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
Replayability~86h to replay
Co-op and replay time. The value score counts hours well past the 14h main story
MonetizationNone
Checked: no in-game purchases or loot boxes. Nothing is docked
For context
Length14 hours
How much game you get. Hours feed the value per dollar
Reach1.5M+ players
How many own it, a popularity + confidence signal
Refunds15 of 800 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked

The value story

October 2024 is where it bottomed out, at $4.99. In 2 years of price history it has never once been discounted.

Against its own genre it lands in the top 1 percent on value. It is better reviewed than 99 percent of its genre. The nearest things to it, Luma Island ($11.99, scores 67) and Super Animal Royale (free, scores 82), are both worse buys on this math.

Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 15 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2025 to September 2026. That is fewer refunded reviewers than 8 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 748 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 500 have a larger share. Inside the two-hour refund window, 91 percent of the 4,146 reviews written there were positive, against 97 percent overall, and those are 7 percent of everything written about it.

Finishing takes 14.3 hours; clearing it takes 165, which is 12 times the campaign.

The drop-off

98% start to <1% rarest
050100rarestfirst achievement

No achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements

Players

686 players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

What players say

ive absolutely loved this game but unfortunately after some drivers updates the games textures got very buggy and is essentially unplayable this is an issue on radeon graphics cards to my knowledge the game should run just fine on nvidia
BurgerKittyNot recommendedafter 3.3hSep 2026Read on Steam
game WAS great when being actively developed but unfortunately the dev was run off the internet by losers online so it likely wont ever get updated again. sad to see really.
Registered Flex OffenderNot recommendedafter 35h45 found this helpfulRead on Steam
I wish the dev still worked on this game. Very relaxing and satisfying to add to your collection of fish.
zelda113Recommendedafter 7.8h18 found this helpfulRead on Steam

Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.

No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

WEBFISHING scores 97/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/3146520/webfishing
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/3146520/webfishing"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/3146520" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/3146520)](https://steambangers.com/game/3146520/webfishing)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 15, price as of Sep 23.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.

Tags

Details

Developerlamedeveloper
Publisherlamedeveloper
GenreShort indie
Released2024
Achievements16