LEGO® Worlds
Skip · Narrative · 2017
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $29.99.
- Length
- 12.3h
- Value
- $2.44/hr
- Reviews
- 78% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when LEGO® Worlds is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, 512MB GPU with Shaders 3.0, 10 GB of storage. Windows only.
Experience a galaxy of Worlds made entirely from LEGO bricks. EXPLORE gigantic landscapes, DISCOVER countless surprises, and CREATE anything you can imagine by building with LEGO bricks.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
February 2025 is where it bottomed out, at $4.49. Its cuts run 75 percent off as a rule. There have been 77 in the 11 years tracked, about 7 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 6 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 7 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 31 percent on value. It is pricier than 98 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 64 percent. Among the games that feel like it, LEGO® Marvel Super Heroes 2 ($19.99, scores 73) beats it on value, while it beats Blockland ($9.99, scores 29).
This site sampled 800 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 16 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written April 2021 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 60 percent of the 2,675 reviews written there were positive, against 78 percent overall, and those are 21 percent of everything written about it.
12.3 hours to finish it, 36 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 2.9 times the campaign.
It carries Valve's Deck Verified rating and runs 12.3 hours, about as long as a handheld game wants to be.
The drop-off
68% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
43 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Worst LEGO game I've played so far. It's just not a fun experience. Bad controls, bad gameplay.
This game sucks SO much, which is sad since it had a lot of potential but it is like IMPOSSIBLE to control correctly. With either keyboard & mouse OR controller, its so incredibly difficult to build anything with how finnicky everything is. Doing anything else is also just not fun, the only saving grace is that the achievements for most of them at least are piss-easy, the ones that are difficult are only difficult...
top 3 BEST lego games ever made right behind lego marvel superheroes and lego batman 2, but only buy it on sale, not worth 30 dollars
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
LEGO® Worlds scores 43/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/332310/lego-worldsThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 16, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.