
Boring Man - Online Tactical Stickman Combat
Worth it · Multiplayer · 2015
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
PLAY IT.
Worth it, and it costs nothing.
- PriceS
- Free to play
- Reviews▼
- 88% of 5,420
- Genre rank
- Top 4% Multiplayer
Holding it back: Reach, Reviews
Time and effort
- Achievements
- 60
Players and genre
- Online
- 1 now
- Better reviewed
- 93% of its genre
Price and player charts
The drop-off
68% start to <1% rarestA game like this has no single ending, so its score does not use the finish rate. The curve shows where players stop. Steam global achievements
The value story
The value story
Its score sits in the top 4 percent of its genre. It is better reviewed than 93 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, HUNTDOWN ($19.99, scores 78) beats it on value, while it beats BRAIN / OUT (free, scores 59).
Its player count is falling. 7 were online at the highest of our weekly checks over 35 days, 1 at the last one, on Nov 6, 20:47 UTC.
Buy now or wait
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
About the game
Battle other 2D stickfigures online while jumping around like a lunatic and getting blown up into smithereens. With over 70 weapons, Boring Man is the most chaotic and hilarious 2D online shooter on the internet.
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, 512MB, 154 MB of storage. Runs on Windows, Linux.
No data upstream: length (HowLongToBeat), critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Boring Man - Online Tactical Stickman Combat scores 71/100 on the BANG Score (worth it) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/346120/boring-man-online-tactical-stickman-combatReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Oct 19. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.
