Trine 2: Complete Story
Worth it · RPG · 2013
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $19.99, a BANGER if it drops to $13.22.
- Length
- 9.1h
- Value
- $2.20/hr
- Reviews
- 95% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Trine 2: Complete Story is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 1 GB of memory, 4.5 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
Three heroes make their way through a fairytale world of forgotten ruins, scheming goblins and impossible contraptions. Play alone and switch between wizard, knight and thief at will, or bring up to two friends, in online or local co-op.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $1.24, set in March 2021. 121 discounts in the 14 years on record. They run about 80 percent off, roughly 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 3 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 5 weeks. It becomes a BANGER at $13.22, a level the record has reached 118 times.
Value puts it in the top 2 percent of the games it competes with. It is pricier than 90 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 99 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Trine Enchanted Edition ($14.99, scores 78) beats it on value, while it beats Trine 4: The Nightmare Prince ($29.99, scores 58).
The press gave it 84; the people who bought it give it 95 percent. An 11-point gap in the buyer's favour.
Steam's global achievement data puts 81 percent of players at this game's ending achievement. The median game this site can measure sits at 8. None of the 570 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 87 percent of the 1,731 reviews written there were positive, against 95 percent overall, and those are 11 percent of everything written about it.
9.1 hours to finish it, 35 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 3.8 times the campaign.
The drop-off
81% start to 81% finishPeople genuinely stick with this one. Steam global achievements
Players
18 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Trine 2 is a fantastic follow-up that offers more challenge and content than the original Trine. The gameplay feels more demanding, which adds to the overall excitement and replayability. The graphics still look impressive even 13 - 14 years after its initial release, showcasing beautiful, vibrant visuals that hold up well over time. While it's not quite as good as Trine 1-mainly because some features like wearable...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Trine 2: Complete Story scores 77/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/35720/trine-2-complete-storyThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 11, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.