
侠客风云传(Tale of Wuxia)
Skip · RPG · 2016
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $16.99.
- Length
- 27.7h
- Value
- $0.61/hr
- Reviews
- 77% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when 侠客风云传(Tale of Wuxia) is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT or equivalent, 20 GB of storage. Windows only.
Tale of Wuxia has been dedicated to providing gameplayers with a player-defined platform, where they can customize their own Wuxia. Instead of being restricted to characters’ basic properties, in this new version, gameplayers can also choose the personalities and talents of their own.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
June 2019 is where it bottomed out, at $8.49. 28 discounts in the 10 years on record. They run about 50 percent off, roughly 14 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 13 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 14 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 21 percent on value. It is pricier than 80 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 63 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Yes, Your Grace ($3.99, scores 78) beats it on value, while it beats 下一站江湖Ⅱ ($19.99, scores 22).
Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 3 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written January 2022 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 56 percent of the 522 reviews written there were positive, against 77 percent overall, and those are 8 percent of everything written about it.
Players
94 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
played for four hours. Game crashed and I lost 2h gameplay. Autosave is not a thing in this apparently. update: Crashing randomly seemingly when loading. Played 3 hours today and it crashed maybe 5 times. No autosave means you get set back multiple times a day. fairly severe crashing issues. I would stay away.
河洛已经失去了这个IP,所有的收益也都 conductivity 进了智冠的口袋,所以它注定要永远沉寂下去了。这全要怪智冠那帮狗奴才,玩这种背后刺人的卑鄙手段!
It's a good game, with a long list of qualifiers: - It's an older game without many modern amenities, and you will probably need to use a guide to complete. I basically failed it the first time I played through blind without a guide, and only came back years later to actually finish it (and used a guide in places). - There are some bugs (at least in the current English version...), one of which will stop you from...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
侠客风云传(Tale of Wuxia) scores 48/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/377530/tale-of-wuxiaThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 23, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.