Planetary Annihilation: TITANS
Fair · Action · 2015
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $29.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Length
- 5.5h
- Value
- $5.45/hr
- Reviews
- 84% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Planetary Annihilation: TITANS is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, Shader 3.0 / OpenGL 3.2 +, 1 GB GPU RAM, 5 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
Wage war across entire solar systems with massive armies at your command. Annihilate enemy forces with world-shattering TITAN-class units, and demolish planets with massive super weapons!
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $2.99. That was February 2021. Its cuts run 75 percent off as a rule. There have been 59 in the 11 years tracked, about 7 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 13 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 7 weeks.
Value puts it in the top 4 percent of the games it competes with. It is pricier than 98 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 88 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Sins of a Solar Empire®: Rebellion ($19.99, scores 92) beats it on value, while it beats Dune: Spice Wars ($13.99, scores 57).
6 of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written June 2021 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 46 percent of the 1,049 reviews written there were positive, against 84 percent overall, and those are 9 percent of everything written about it. It sells extras on top of the sticker price (cosmetic); the score docks it lightly for that.
Finishing takes 5.5 hours; clearing it takes 31, which is 5.6 times the campaign.
The drop-off
37% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
102 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Logistics matter a lot, your army could be on the wrong planet. Proper titans. Orbital layer - unique!
i used to watch this game as a kid all the time and it does not disappoint. 10 crashing planets/10
No idea what the new update has done but this is now a game I no longer want to play or recommend. Consistent crashing, on game loading or just randomly throughout a skirmish game. Gameplay reducing to 11% after 15-20 minutes of game time, only way to fix is to save and restart the game entirely. User inputs are ignored throughout gameplay, or there is a delay. New main menu was confusing at start, and the chat box...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Planetary Annihilation: TITANS scores 63/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/386070/planetary-annihilation-titansThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 17, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.