Forts
BANGER · Action · 2017
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
BUY IT.
A BANGER at $14.99.
- Length
- 8.7h
- Value
- $1.72/hr
- Reviews
- 92% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Forts is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, Intel HD Graphics 520, 3 GB of storage. Windows only.
Unleash your creativity and strategic prowess in Forts, the exhilarating physics-based RTS! Design, construct, and customize imposing fortresses, bristling with devastating firepower, and blast your opponent’s buildings to rubble!
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
March 2019 is where it bottomed out, at $7.49. Its cuts run 40 percent off as a rule. There have been 71 in the 9 years tracked, about 6 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 2 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 6 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 1 percent on value. It is pricier than 86 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 97 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Factorio ($35.00, scores 97) beats it on value, while it beats Dig or Die ($11.99, scores 79).
On this data it would still be a BANGER at $34.58. It costs $14.99.
The press gave it 74; the people who bought it give it 92 percent. An 18-point gap in the buyer's favour.
Steam's global achievement data says about 6 percent of players ever finish it. On an 8.7-hour game, that is a lot of paid-for hours most people never see. This site sampled 800 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 13 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written November 2023 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 62 percent of the 687 reviews written there were positive, against 92 percent overall, and those are 3 percent of everything written about it.
8.7 hours to finish it, 41 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 4.7 times the campaign.
The drop-off
86% start to 6% finishMost players never reach the end. On an 8.7-hour game, that's a lot you pay for and may never use. Steam global achievements
Players
379 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Game is VERY fun once to get to play it. Also, if your framerate is horrible, search up "how to enable -vulkan into forts" at it will help! worth the purchase.
it's a good game, a small community of dedicated people. good mod support very fun with friends can be quite competitive
w game got destroyed by ai for 5 hours but i can now beat a easy ai. 10/10 wasted my time but was fun.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Forts scores 87/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/410900/fortsThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 13, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.