AI: Rampage
Skip · Action · 2016
The verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $0.99.
- Length
- 0.2h
- Value
- $4.95/hr
- Reviews
- 40% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when AI: Rampage is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 1 GB of memory, Graphics: Nvidia GF 8600GT, AMD Radeon HD3650, Intel HD2000. Windows only.
Fight against the robots and reclaim the land! Attempt to survive in a post-apocalyptic wasteland, where it seems like everything wants you dead! Tactical stealth action in a post-apocalyptic settings!
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
April 2016 is where it bottomed out, at $0.49. It has been discounted 81 times in the 11 years tracked here, typically at 60 percent off, with about 6 weeks between sales. Today's $0.99 at 50 percent off still sits 102 percent above the floor, so a deeper cut exists in its history.
It is cheaper than 84 percent of its genre, and less well reviewed than 99 percent. The games it most resembles do better on the same math. Medieval Engineers ($9.99, scores 2) and SpyParty ($24.99, scores 24) both outscore it.
None of the 205 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written April 2020 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 27 percent of the 146 reviews written there were positive, against 40 percent overall, and those are 43 percent of everything written about it.
Finishing takes 0.2 hours; clearing it takes 5, which is 23 times the campaign.
The drop-off
3% start to 3% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
1 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Frustrating spawn camping, buggy restarts, and extreme difficulty. Avoid if you value fair, engaging gameplay.
Bundle filler. The mechanics of the game are never explained and even if you find out what's going on and what you can do, various mechanics/ controls don't even seem to work.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
AI: Rampage scores 0/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/438020/ai-rampageThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 1, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.