
RISK: Global Domination
Fair · Strategy · 2020
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
NO RUSH.
Free and middling. Worth a look if the genre is yours.
- Length
- 14.4h
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 79% positive
Recent reviews trending down: 65% over the last 30 days against 79% all-time.
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, DirectX 11, 1 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
Take over the world in RISK: Global Domination, the iconic strategy board game with 100+ original and classic maps and millions of players
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
Value puts it in the top 14 percent of the games it competes with. It is better reviewed than 76 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Card Hunter (free, scores 62) beats it on value, while it beats KARDS - The WW2 Card Game (free, scores 21).
Players rate it 79 percent positive over its lifetime, but the last 30 days run 65 percent. Something recent has soured the room.
The main story runs 14.4 hours. Doing everything runs 32, 2.2 times as long.
It came out 6 years ago and 2.2K were still playing it at the last check.
It is still busy. 2.2K players were in it at once at the last check, across 81 days of tracking. Free to start. It takes its money later, through unlock.
The drop-off
96% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
2,153 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
RISK: Global Domination scores 52/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1128810/risk-global-dominationThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.