Order of Battle: World War II
Skip · Strategy · 2015
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The reviews do not carry it. What it costs you is time.
- Length
- 56.8h
- Price
- Free to play
- Reviews
- 78% positive
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, 512 Mb DirectX 11 video card with shader model 2.0, 1 GB of storage. Windows only.
Order of Battle: World War II is a breath of fresh air for all strategy fans. It is a game that takes wargaming to a new level by upgrading every single game element and rebooting the genre for a new generation of players.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
Value puts it in the top 17 percent of the games it competes with. It is better reviewed than 73 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Battle for Wesnoth (free, scores 86) beats it on value, while it beats Operation: Harsh Doorstop (free, scores 48).
It is still busy. 167 players were in it at once at the last check, across 81 days of tracking.
The drop-off
59% start to 2% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
167 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Here I will leave the cat, friends who pass by can pet it and give it a thumbs up ／＞ フ | _ _ l ／` ミ＿xノ / | / ヽ ﾉ │ | | | ／￣| | | | | (￣ヽ＿_ヽ_)__) ＼二つ
Taiwan no 1, or I should say ROC? It's a WWII battle chess game, for more detail this game are each campaign, all players got a starter troops and some maps would spawn more troops as reinforcement, his game are like Civilization but chop the maps into small conflict, it's need more deeper thought if develop want players replay this game, and personal can't found the tutorial in-game. This game difficult are large...
STEAM REVIEW: „World War Wet Dreams 2" - A Broken Spreadsheet Disguised as History Verdict: This game has absolutely nothing to do with real World War II tactics, history, or basic logic. It is a dry, mathematical Excel spreadsheet hidden behind WWII asset skins, where artificial rules completely insult the player's intelligence. Here are the 6 reasons why this game is a massive, misleading scam for anyone looking...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Order of Battle: World War II scores 49/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/312450/order-of-battle-world-war-iiThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 21.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.