Fun with Ragdolls: The Game
Skip · Action · 2019
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $14.99.
- Length
- 0.1h
- Value
- $149.90/hr
- Reviews
- 88% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Fun with Ragdolls: The Game is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, Intel UHD Graphics 605, 205 MB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
Become a ragdoll and create your own environments in Sandbox Mode, explore worlds created by others, or just flop around your destructible sets! Fun with Ragdolls®: The Game lets you enjoy everything you love about ragdolls!
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
December 2020 is where it bottomed out, at $3.74. 18 discounts in the 7 years on record. They run about 40 percent off, roughly 9 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 12 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 9 weeks.
On value it sits in the top 31 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 84 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 93 percent. On the same math Fireworks Mania - An Explosive Simulator ($14.99, scores 62) and Scrap Mechanic ($28.99, scores 79) are the better buys, and they are the games it most resembles.
19 of the 676 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written April 2020 to August 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 8 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 3,221 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 699 have a larger share. Inside the two-hour refund window, 68 percent of the 434 reviews written there were positive, against 88 percent overall, and those are 10 percent of everything written about it.
The main story runs 0.1 hours. Doing everything runs 0, 2.0 times as long.
Players
37 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
bought fun little ragdoll game back in 2023 not playing it for many years find out instead of updating the game, they just remade the game with better/more fun stuff that you have to pay for once again
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Fun with Ragdolls: The Game scores 38/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1142500/fun-with-ragdolls-the-gameThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.