F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin

F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin

Fair · Shooter · 2009

Steam Deck Playable

The verdict

NO RUSH.

Fair at $14.99. Buy it if you want it.

Length
7.1h
Value
$2.11/hr
Reviews
85% positive
That is 59% off today, though reviews keep it under BANGER.
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.

Get one email when F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin is worth buying.

One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.

Length
7.1h
main story (HowLongToBeat)
Completionist
10.9h
100% (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
$2.11
price ÷ main-story length
Price
$14.99
as of Sep 24
Reviews
85%
9,456 reviews, as of Aug 1
Metacritic
79
critic score
Players
750K
owners (estimate)
Released
2009

Minimum on the Steam store: 1 GB of memory, Fully DX9-compliant graphics card with 256MB (SM 2.0b). NVIDIA 6800 or ATI X700, 12 GB of storage. Windows only.

Assume the role of Special Forces Sgt. Becket as your routine mission quickly turns into a fight for survival against the wrath of Alma Wade. As Alma's terrifying power surges out of control, your squad is forced to battle through an apocalyptic landscape in search of clues for how to destroy her!
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

Raising the score
MonetizationNone
No in-game purchases. Paid DLC exists and is not docked
Holding it back
Value$2.11/hr
Price per hour of game. It moves the score inside the ceiling reviews set
Reviews85% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
For context
Length7.1 hours
How much game you get. Hours feed the value per dollar
Reach750K+ players
How many own it, a popularity + confidence signal
Refunds1 of 800 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked

The value story

April 2024 is where it bottomed out, at $2.99. Its cuts run 75 percent off as a rule. There have been 82 in the 14 years tracked, about 6 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 13 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 6 weeks.

Against its own genre it lands in the top 29 percent on value. It is pricier than 66 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 70 percent. Among the games that feel like it, F.E.A.R. ($9.99, scores 82) beats it on value, while it beats F.E.A.R. 3 ($19.99, scores 22).

This site sampled 800 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 1 was written by a buyer who refunded it, sampled from reviews written August 2022 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 63 percent of the 576 reviews written there were positive, against 85 percent overall, and those are 10 percent of everything written about it.

Players

41 players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

What players say

Not as good as F.E.A.R 1, but still a playable game. The only thing I can say about this game is its the type of game you will see a gamer is playing on a movie. It reminds me of that so much because its so 2000s. Overall a game that's still worth to play in my opinion despite the game being not that comparable to its predecessor.
Sir-Comes-Alot-779Recommendedafter 10h1 found this helpfulRead on Steam
This is the last good game that was ever made. Back when the industry was still moving forward, I replay this game every year, just to remind myself what the future of gaming could have been,.. if we didn't all collectively suck.. The DLC is boooring... but you should definitly get the base game for a few bucks when it's on sale. It runs on potatoes and the graphics can compete with almost anything that came out...
RoachRecommendedafter 12h3 found this helpfulRead on Steam
It's an awesome game very well made but if you are running it on a PC with multiple monitors you will have do is to go into the configuration file using a text editor such as notepad for example to change the default video monitor from the for example the secondary monitor to the mina one for your system on mine i had to change it to the config file it's located in the documents folder on you main C: drive in your...
Christopher Alan GohmRecommendedafter 159hJul 2026Read on Steam

Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.

No data upstream: achievement curve (Steam global achievements).

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

F.E.A.R. 2: Project Origin scores 56/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/16450/f-e-a-r-2-project-origin
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/16450/f-e-a-r-2-project-origin"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/16450" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/16450)](https://steambangers.com/game/16450/f-e-a-r-2-project-origin)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 1, price as of Sep 24.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.

Critics vs players+6
Critics
79
Players
85
Critics and players agree on this one.
Metacritic critics · 9,456 Steam player reviews

Tags

Details

DeveloperMonolith
PublisherWarner Bros. Games
GenreShooter
Released2009