Vampire Hunters
Worth it · Roguelike · 2024
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $4.49, the lowest Steam price we have tracked since Jul 2023.
- Length
- 9.5h
- Value
- $0.47/hr
- Reviews
- 90% positive
Buy now or wait
The Autumn Sale is on until Oct 8. It is 70% off today.
Discounted in each of its last 7 seasonal sales on record.
- Typical seasonal cut
- 40% ($8.99)
- Deepest seasonal cut
- 65% ($5.24)
Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.
Watch this gameOne alert when it is worth buying.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, GTX 460 or equivalent, 7 GB of storage. Windows only.
To hunt vampires, you'll need guns. Lots of guns. Mow down hordes of undead creatures by stacking your guns into absurd, over-the-top builds. Unleash your firepower and survive the mayhem in this Roguelite Survivors FPS.
What drives the score
How to read this
Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
The value story
The lowest price on record is $4.49, set in August 2026. Its cuts run 33 percent off as a rule. There have been 31 in the 3 years tracked, about 6 weeks apart. Today's $4.49 at 70 percent off matches the lowest price in the record.
Value puts it in the top 27 percent of the games it competes with. It is better reviewed than 76 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Boneraiser Minions ($4.99, scores 85) beats it on value, while it beats Immortal Redneck ($19.95, scores 67).
14 of the 499 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written July 2023 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 74 percent of the 289 reviews written there were positive, against 90 percent overall, and those are 15 percent of everything written about it.
HowLongToBeat players log 9.5 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 27, 2.9 times as much.
At 9.5 hours it is a handheld-sized game, and Valve rates it Deck Verified.
The drop-off
96% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
151 players online when we last checked, on Sep 30, 15:49 UTC.
Player counts from the Steam Web API.
What players say
I dont dislike this game, but the devs here severely undercooked with this idea. Its just so barebones. I dont even mind its a blantant ripoff, I was just expecting more context, and for the success of this game, at least more updates. Its ok, and the dopamine is nice, but you might be wise to spend your limited time on other survivoralikes.
I started off enjoying this game, but the more I played, the less I liked it The game has two halves: Survivor mode, and Classic mode Survivor mode is what you see in the trailers. You run around with lots of guns and fight off non-stop enemies. Killing enemies drops exp, which levels you up, which allows you to pick more weapons or perks. The big selling point that separates it from other bullet heavens is that...
Vampire Hunters. First Person Vampire Survivors-Like. LETS GET THE TL;DR LITMUS TEST OUT OF THE WAY. 1. DOES IT GET THE POINT OF VAMPIRE SURVIVORS (Power Fantasy, Enemy Hordes, Proper Scaling): Globally? No. Game has hordes, but you lack mobility in a 3D space and you have the "Risk of Rain 2 Problem" of being kicked in the back where in the original version, you can see behind you easily due to the previous...
Steam reviews, mixed to match its Steam ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Vampire Hunters scores 68/100 on the BANG Score (worth it) as of Oct 2, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2206270/vampire-huntersReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 26, price as of Oct 1.
A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.