Expeditions: Conquistador
Fair · RPG · 2013
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $4.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Cost per hourS
- $0.20/hr
- Reviews▼
- 79% of 1,631
- Critics
- 77 players 2 higher
- Genre rank
- Top 13% RPG
Holding it back: Reviews
Score at full price
Score today
Watch this gameOne alert at a price you pick.
Time and effort
- Main story
- 24.5h
- To 100%
- 39h 1.6x the story
- Finish
- 17% reach the ending
- Achievements
- 60
Price and sales
- Sales
- 88 on record
- Typical cut
- 75% off
- Steam low
- $1.99 January 2026
- Sale every
- 48d last November 2026
Players and genre
- Online
- 5 now
- Cheaper than
- 10% of its genre
- Better reviewed
- 72% of its genre
Price and player charts
The drop-off
66% start to 17% finishA normal fall-off for a game this long. Steam global achievements
The value story
The value story
January 2026 is where it bottomed out, at $1.99. It has been discounted 88 times in the 13 years tracked here. The median cut across all of them is 75 percent, about 7 weeks apart.
Its score sits in the top 13 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 90 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 72 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Expeditions: Viking ($7.49, scores 65) beats it on value, while it beats Hard West ($19.99, scores 35).
More about Expeditions: Conquistador
Steam's global achievement data puts about 17 percent of players at this game's ending achievement. On a 24.5-hour game, the hours short of it still count in its price per hour. 1 of the 404 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here comes from a buyer who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to October 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 40 percent of the 101 reviews written there were positive, against 79 percent overall, and those are 8 percent of everything written about it.
Buy now or wait
Buy now or wait
Discounted in each of its last 8 seasonal sales.
- Next sale
- Winter Sale, Dec 17 to Jan 4
Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
What players say
The guy who says this is a mobile port has no idea what he's talking about. As a Kickstarter backer for more than $30, I got to play this in beta. The game's graphics and animations are a bit rough, but the gameplay itself is fantastic. The Logic Dreams guys made a stand-out hit, and the mix of planning at the strategic level (through trading, supply lines, and etc) as well as the flexible tactics make for a fun and...
2 more reviews, 1 not recommended
After reading and hearing mixed opinions I've been pleasently surprised. First I really like unique/less exploited settings and that is exactly what we get here, La conquista de América is rather rarely used in games, probably even less in RPGish genre. Worth noting is that, it's not just based on facts, as there are some changes and even a little bit of paranormal activites, which only makes it even more...
It's kind of just a slog from start to finish. I wouldn't go so far as to say it's a bad game, it's just not for me.
Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
About the game
Conquer the New world: In the 16th Century, Spanish explorers and soldiers reached the shores of America. The search for gold, fame, and adventure drove these travelers into a treacherous wilderness where they faced hunger, disease, and dangerous predators. In their wake, the Aztec Empires lay in ruins.
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory. Runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
Cite this score
Expeditions: Conquistador scores 57/100 on the BANG Score (fair value) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/237430/expeditions-conquistadorReviews set the ceiling, and price against real length moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Nov 1, price as of Nov 7. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.