Expeditions: A MudRunner Game
Skip · Strategy · 2024
The verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $39.99.
- Reviews
- 57% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Expeditions: A MudRunner Game is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, 2 GB VRAM, Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 / AMD Radeon R7 370, 20 GB of storage. Windows only.
Embark on scientific expeditions with this new off-road adventure game. Lead research missions as you drive a variety of all-terrain vehicles, using high-tech tools and managing your camp and crew to ensure your success in the wild.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
- How long it takes to beat isn't in our data. The score is docked for the missing length.
The value story
September 2026 is where it bottomed out, at $13.99. 24 discounts in the 3 years on record. They run about 50 percent off, roughly 6 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 3 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 6 weeks.
It is pricier than 98 percent of its genre, and less well reviewed than 96 percent. The games it most resembles do better on the same math. RoadCraft ($39.99, scores 40) and SnowRunner ($29.99, scores 74) both outscore it.
24 of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written June 2024 to August 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 9 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 2,864 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 255 have a larger share. The typical game sits near 5 in 1,000, so the score docks it. 5 of the 24 refunded reviewers were past Valve's two-hour window when they wrote the review. Inside the two-hour refund window, 26 percent of the 472 reviews written there were positive, against 57 percent overall, and those are 16 percent of everything written about it.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Expeditions: A MudRunner Game scores 1/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). Length is not in our data, so the score is docked. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2477340/expeditions-a-mudrunner-gameThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 23.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.