Call of Duty® (2003)
Fair · Shooter · 2006
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
WAIT.
Fair today. The Winter Sale opens Dec 17, and it was discounted in 7 of its last 8 seasonal sales; 50% in the Winter Sale 2025.
Today
$19.99Fair
Typical seasonal cut
$9.9950% offWorth it
- Cost per hour▼
- $2.94/hr
- ReviewsS
- 95% of 7,921
- Critics
- 91 players 4 higher
- Genre rank
- Top 16% Shooter
Holding it back: Cost per hour
Why
Watch this gameOne alert at $9.99 or less.
Time and effort
- Main story
- 6.8h
- To 100%
- 10h 1.5x the story
Price and sales
- Sales
- 86 on record
- Typical cut
- 50% off
- Steam low
- $7.99 November 2019
- Sale every
- 47d last September 2026
Players and genre
- Online
- 53 now
- Cheaper than
- 16% of its genre
- Better reviewed
- 95% of its genre
Price and player charts
The value story
The value story
Across all 86 discounts in the 13 years tracked, the median cut is 50 percent, about 7 weeks apart. $7.77 is what it would take to make this a BANGER, and nothing in its history goes that low.
Against its own genre its score lands in the top 16 percent. It is pricier than 84 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 95 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Call of Duty® 2 ($19.99, scores 69) beats it on value, while it beats Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45 ($4.99, scores 64).
More about Call of Duty® (2003)
15 of the 588 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to October 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 7 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 1,424 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 393 have a larger share. Inside the two-hour refund window, 84 percent of the 774 reviews written there were positive, against 95 percent overall, and those are 10 percent of everything written about it.
Buy now or wait
Buy now or wait
Last discount ended 51 days ago.
Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
What players say
Its classic but has issues but that can be forgiven since it was the first one and it was made in 2003. Still better then Modern COD
1 more review, not recommended
Se siente prehistórico. Los níveles son en su mayoría bastante fieros y chatos. El gun play se siente tosco. No tiene una "historia" la verdad. Se ve remil oscuro y muchas veces es difícil ver los enemigos. Los níveles consisten en entrar a un área, que te oneshoteen, respawnear e intentar recordar donde están los enemigos para dispararles antes de que te one-shooteen de nuevo. Solo se lo recomendaría a un enfermo...
Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
About the game
Call of Duty® delivers the gritty realism and cinematic intensity of World War II's epic battlefield moments like never before.
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 123 MB of memory, 1.4 GB of storage. Windows only.
No data upstream: achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Call of Duty® (2003) scores 67/100 on the BANG Score (fair value) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2620/call-of-duty-2003Reviews set the ceiling, and price against real length moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Oct 31, price as of Nov 7. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.