Call of Duty: United Offensive
Fair · Shooter · 2006
Steam Deck UnsupportedThe verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $19.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Cost per hour▼
- $3.51/hr
- Reviews▼
- 87% of 2,467
- Critics
- 87
- Genre rank
- Top 36% Shooter
Holding it back: Cost per hour, Reviews
Why
Watch this gameOne alert at $7.05 or less.
Time and effort
- Main story
- 5.7h
- To 100%
- 8.1h 1.4x the story
Price and sales
- Sales
- 81 on record
- Typical cut
- 25% off
- Steam low
- $9.79 June 2015
- Sale every
- 46d last September 2026
Players and genre
- Online
- 16 now
- Cheaper than
- 16% of its genre
- Better reviewed
- 73% of its genre
Price and player charts
The value story
The value story
Across all 81 discounts in the 13 years tracked, the median cut is 25 percent, about 7 weeks apart. Today it is at full price, and its last discount ended about 7 weeks ago.
Against its own genre its score lands in the top 36 percent. It is pricier than 84 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 73 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Red Orchestra: Ostfront 41-45 ($4.99, scores 64) beats it on value, while it beats Battlefield™ V ($49.99, scores 24).
More about Call of Duty: United Offensive
This site sampled 512 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 4 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to October 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 63 percent of the 309 reviews written there were positive, against 87 percent overall, and those are 13 percent of everything written about it.
Buy now or wait
Buy now or wait
Discounted in 6 of its last 8 seasonal sales. Last discount ended 51 days ago.
- Next sale
- Winter Sale, Dec 17 to Jan 4
Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
What players say
I loved this game as a kid. I used watch Zevik's playthrough of it and was fascinated by the game's extended arsenal and introduction to tanks I had never seen before in Call of Duty (2003). Now that I've played through it several times, I realized how there is little to no cover in almost all of the missions and how annoying the last level was. There is no doubt that most of the hours of playtime were from trying...
2 more reviews, 1 not recommended
"8/10." I actually really enjoyed this one. United Offensive takes what worked in the original and adds quite a few new things to the formula. Sprinting is probably the most obvious addition, but the new weapons and mission concepts also help make it feel like more than just a simple expansion. The difficulty spikes are definitely more common this time around, though. There were a few sections where I found myself...
The campaign is good, dont get me wrong. It expands on the original one and adds some cool fights on a plane and in tanks. It is worth the experience but not the money. And thats why I leave the negative comment. It is a 20+ old expansion to a game. It costs 15 bucks on discount for just 6 hours. Given that you already pay 10 for the original game which I did in 7, I feel that those should have been a single package...
Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
About the game
Award-winning developer Gray Matter Interactive follows up on the success of Infinity Ward's Call of Duty™ - winner of over 80 Game of the Year and 50 Editors' Choice awards worldwide - with Call of Duty™: United Offensive™.
Minimum specs
Windows only.
No data upstream: achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Call of Duty: United Offensive scores 53/100 on the BANG Score (fair value) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2640/call-of-duty-united-offensiveReviews set the ceiling, and price against real length moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Nov 1, price as of Nov 7. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.