Grim Legends 2: Song of the Dark Swan

Grim Legends 2: Song of the Dark Swan

Fair · Narrative · 2015

The verdict

NO RUSH.

Fair at $14.99. Buy it if you want it.

Reviews
96% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.

Get one email when Grim Legends 2: Song of the Dark Swan is worth buying.

One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.

Price
$14.99
as of Aug 29
Reviews
96%
1,334 reviews, as of Aug 2
Players
150K
owners (estimate)
Released
2015
Length + $/hr
No data
no length in our data yet

Minimum on the Steam store: 512 MB of memory, 128 MB VRAM, 1 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.

Save the feuding kingdoms!
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

What we assumed
  • How long it takes to beat isn't in our data. The score is docked for the missing length.
Raising the score
Reviews96% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones Scored as 95% after the small-sample adjustment
Engagement58% finish
How far players actually get (achievements), a top-end bonus
Holding it back
Length unknownNo verified $/hr
No length in our data yet, so the biggest driver can't be verified. A heavy dock until it is
For context
Reach150K+ players
How many own it, a popularity + confidence signal
MonetizationNot known
No monetization record for this game, so nothing is assumed either way
Refunds0 of 324 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked

The value story

October 2019 is where it bottomed out, at $2.99. 51 discounts in the 11 years on record. They run about 60 percent off, roughly 6 weeks apart.

On value it sits in the top 9 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 82 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 98 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Enigmatis 2: The Mists of Ravenwood ($14.99, scores 62) beats it on value, while it beats Grim Legends: The Forsaken Bride ($14.99, scores 57).

Steam's global achievement data puts 58 percent of players at this game's ending achievement. The median game this site can measure sits at 8. None of the 324 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written April 2020 to August 2026.

The drop-off

66% start to 58% finish
050100rarestfirst achievement

People genuinely stick with this one. Steam global achievements

Players

5 players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

Grim Legends 2: Song of the Dark Swan scores 60/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). Length is not in our data, so the score is docked. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/279800/grim-legends-2-song-of-the-dark-swan
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/279800/grim-legends-2-song-of-the-dark-swan"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/279800" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/279800)](https://steambangers.com/game/279800/grim-legends-2-song-of-the-dark-swan)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Aug 29.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.