LORT
Skip · Action · 2026 · Early Access
The verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $14.99.
- Reviews
- 77% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when LORT is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, NVIDIA GTX 1060 / AMD RX 580, 4 GB of storage. Windows only.
LORT is a 1–8 player co-op action roguelite. Team up with your friends to battle, loot, and stack ridiculous power-ups across a cursed fantasy world. Fight toward escape, revive your homies, and get absolutely chadded as you evolve from goblin tickler to god slapper.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
- How long it takes to beat isn't in our data. We scored it as a typical Action game (about 6 hours) and docked the score for the missing length.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $9.74. That was March 2026. 4 discounts in the 8 months on record. They run about 35 percent off, roughly 7 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 14 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 7 weeks.
On value it sits in the top 48 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 81 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 71 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Blood Trail ($24.99, scores 32) beats it on value, while it beats Spellbook Demonslayers ($4.99, scores 30).
Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 53 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written February 2026 to August 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 9 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 3,221 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 274 have a larger share. The typical game sits near 5 in 1,000, so the score docks it. 1 of the 53 refunded reviewers was past Valve's two-hour window when they wrote the review. Inside the two-hour refund window, 44 percent of the 683 reviews written there were positive, against 77 percent overall, and those are 18 percent of everything written about it.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
LORT scores 31/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). Length is estimated at 6 hours, not measured, so the score is docked. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2956680/lortThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 23.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.