FATE: Reawakened
Skip · Roguelike · 2025
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
SKIP IT.
It scores 27, under the fair line, at $24.99.
- Length
- 12.4h
- Value
- $2.02/hr
- Reviews
- 74% of 789 positive
Watch this gameOne alert at a price you pick.
Buy now or wait
Discounted in each of its last 6 seasonal sales. Last cut ended 9 days ago.
- Next sale
- Winter Sale, Dec 17 to Jan 4
Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.
What drives the score
How to read this
Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
About the game
Reawaken the critically acclaimed FATE games like never before! Play all 4 classic dungeon crawler titles with enhanced graphics as you battle through challenging procedurally generated dungeons, learn powerful spells, and fish to your heart’s content. Are you up to the task? Your FATE awaits!
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, Nvidia 1030, AMD Radeon Vega 3, Intel UHD 620, 4 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
The value story
It has been discounted 11 times in the 2 years tracked here. The median cut across all of them is 20 percent, about 8 weeks apart. Today it is at full price, and its last discount ended 9 days ago.
It is pricier than 91 percent of its genre, and less well reviewed than 74 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Moonlighter ($19.99, scores 59) beats it on value, while it beats BELOW ($24.99, scores 24).
More about FATE: Reawakened
Of the 503 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 19 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2025 to August 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 9 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 1,174 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 29 have a larger share. The typical game sits near 5 in 1,000, so the score docks it. 4 of the 19 refunded reviewers were past Valve's two-hour window when they wrote the review. Inside the two-hour refund window, 56 percent of the 198 reviews written there were positive, against 74 percent overall, and those are 26 percent of everything written about it.
At 12.4 hours it is a handheld-sized game, and Valve rates it Deck Verified.
The drop-off
77% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
What players say
Good game, but it wont let you use console commands on newer computers. its something they should put into the game, like the old Fate game had it, luckily i got this on a deal for like 5 bucks. Sill f**king sucks that i cant use them any more.
2 more reviews, 1 not recommended
Guess my FATE was to play better ARPGs all along. Was curious were Torchlight started, but really should have reminded myself of those games before buying the beta version of a mediocre aRPG (a game that is so much a clone of this game it's user manual on steam has the heading "FATE User Manual"). No personality, no story, no progression in both item, character and sense of exploration. Devs hate fun so much theres...
Only thing I dislike is the quest always make you go to higher levels even tho your character is not ready for it especially if you are on a harder difficulty. At that rate leveling up takes quite a long time to be able to go from level 7 to level 10 or even level 9 in the dungeon. Overall fun game to pass time with.
Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
FATE: Reawakened scores 27/100 on the BANG Score (a skip) as of Oct 19, 2026. The developer disclosed AI-generated content on Steam, so the score is docked. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/3030720/fate-reawakenedReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Oct 1, price as of Oct 19. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.