Mountain

Mountain

Worth it · RPG · 2014

Steam Deck Playable

The verdict

BUY IT.

Worth it at $0.99.

Length
10.1h
Value
$0.10/hr
Reviews
88% positive
It will not reach BANGER at any price.
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.

Get one email when Mountain is worth buying.

One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.

Length
10.1h
main story (HowLongToBeat)
Completionist
256.4h
100% (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
$0.10
price ÷ main-story length
Price
$0.99
as of Sep 24
Reviews
88%
16,285 reviews, as of Aug 2
Players
750K
owners (estimate)
Released
2014

Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, Radeon HD5450 or better; 256 MB or higher, 205 MB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.

Existential Nature Simulation
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

Raising the score
Value$0.10/hr
Price per hour of game. It moves the score inside the ceiling reviews set
Replayability~61h to replay
Co-op and replay time. The value score counts hours well past the 10h main story
MonetizationNone
Checked: no in-game purchases or loot boxes. Nothing is docked
Holding it back
Reviews88% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
For context
Length10 hours
How much game you get. Hours feed the value per dollar
Reach750K+ players
How many own it, a popularity + confidence signal
Refunds3 of 619 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked

The value story

September 2023 is where it bottomed out, at $0.47. Its cuts run 51 percent off as a rule. There have been 70 in the 12 years tracked, about 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 15 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 5 weeks.

On value it sits in the top 2 percent of its genre. It is cheaper than 94 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 91 percent. Among the games that feel like it, The Plan (free, scores 82) beats it on value, while it beats Among Ripples (free, scores 23).

3 of the 619 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 82 percent of the 4,837 reviews written there were positive, against 88 percent overall, and those are 37 percent of everything written about it.

The main story runs 10.1 hours. Doing everything runs 256, 25 times as long.

The drop-off

43% start to 3% rarest
050100rarestfirst achievement

No achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements

Players

40 players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

What players say

I have had this running in the background for ages, And I guess thats the point. I just dont get this type of game.
Grey BeardNot recommendedafter 23h1 found this helpfulRead on Steam
if you are having issues with any game that runs on UE4 while also playing Mountain, guess what this game messes with it, Plus your 987 hour achievement might not be counting
YatoNot recommendedafter 855hMay 2026Read on Steam
Interactive screensaver. Has really cool ambient sounds that are great to sleep to. It also has random jump scares that demand you hammer the keyboard for a minute or be left with a bright white screen, so sometimes very bad to sleep to.
BubonicDuckRecommendedafter 989hJun 2026Read on Steam

Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.

No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

Mountain scores 78/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/313340/mountain
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/313340/mountain"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/313340" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/313340)](https://steambangers.com/game/313340/mountain)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 24.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.

Tags

Details

DeveloperDavid OReilly
PublisherDavid OReilly
GenreRPG
Released2014
Achievements31