LEGO® Jurassic World
Worth it · Action · 2015
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $19.99, a BANGER if it drops to $9.12.
- Length
- 10.2h
- Value
- $1.96/hr
- Reviews
- 93% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when LEGO® Jurassic World is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce 7600GS or ATI Radeon 1950, 256 Mb RAM, 10 GB of storage. Windows only.
Following the epic storylines of Jurassic Park, The Lost World: Jurassic Park and Jurassic Park III, as well as the highly anticipated Jurassic World, LEGO Jurassic World™ is the first videogame where players will be able to relive and experience all four Jurassic films.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $3.99, set in February 2024. 78 discounts in the 11 years on record. They run about 75 percent off, roughly 7 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 13 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 7 weeks. It becomes a BANGER at $9.12, a level the record has reached 70 times.
Value puts it in the top 2 percent of the games it competes with. It is pricier than 94 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 97 percent. Among the games that feel like it, LEGO® Marvel™ Super Heroes ($19.99, scores 81) beats it on value, while it beats LEGO® Batman™ 3: Beyond Gotham ($19.99, scores 64).
72 from critics against 93 percent from players, and the player number comes from people who own the game.
This site sampled 605 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 11 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 67 percent of the 544 reviews written there were positive, against 93 percent overall, and those are 7 percent of everything written about it.
10.2 hours to finish it, 30 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 2.9 times the campaign.
It carries Valve's Deck Verified rating and runs 10.2 hours, about as long as a handheld game wants to be.
The drop-off
80% start to 8% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
95 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
It has its game breaking glitches like raptors not being able to go up certain parts where they should be able to, and characters getting stuck behind areas that you have to restart the game for, but hey, you get to play as dinosaurs and customize them so that's pretty sick!
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
LEGO® Jurassic World scores 71/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/352400/lego-jurassic-worldThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 13, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.