
STAR WARS™ Galactic Battlegrounds Saga
BANGER · Action · 2016
Steam Deck UnsupportedThe verdict
BUY IT.
A BANGER at $5.99.
- Length
- 42.4h
- Value
- $0.14/hr
- Reviews
- 91% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when STAR WARS™ Galactic Battlegrounds Saga is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 1 GB of memory, 891 MB of storage. Windows only.
Lead the great armies of the Star Wars™ Episode II: Attack of the Clones saga in intense real-time strategy clashes. Enter the fray as the Galactic Empire, Rebel Alliance, Wookies, Trade Federation, Gungans or Royal Naboo to determine the course of the Galactic Civil War.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
May 2024 is where it bottomed out, at $1.49. It has been discounted 49 times in the 11 years tracked here, typically at 65 percent off, with about 8 weeks between sales. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 2 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 8 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 1 percent on value. It is better reviewed than 96 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Supreme Commander: Forged Alliance ($12.99, scores 97) beats it on value, while it beats Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War III ($39.99, scores 2).
On this data it would still be a BANGER at $32.08. It costs $5.99.
2 of the 399 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written October 2022 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 79 percent of the 604 reviews written there were positive, against 91 percent overall, and those are 15 percent of everything written about it.
Players
169 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
My fav RTS of all time. We need a remake or remaster with enhanced graphics like they did with age of mythology
i grew up with this game because my father grew up on it. its still just as good.
I have loved this game since it has come out. I play against the 7 computers, sometimes free for all or teams. I am glad I got to pick it up 10 years later. It is a fun game.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
STAR WARS™ Galactic Battlegrounds Saga scores 85/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/356500/star-wars-galactic-battlegrounds-sagaThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.