Windosill
Fair · Narrative · 2009
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $2.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Length
- 0.6h
- Value
- $4.98/hr
- Reviews
- 92% positive
Watch this gameOne alert when it is worth buying.
Minimum on the Steam store: 256 MB of memory, No special requirements. Runs on Windows, macOS.
A short, surprising, toy-like puzzle game.
What drives the score
How to read this
Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $0.98. That was November 2016. It has been discounted 20 times in the 13 years tracked here, typically at 67 percent off, with about 19 weeks between sales.
On value it sits in the top 6 percent of its genre. It is cheaper than 78 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 92 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Landlord of the Woods ($0.99, scores 95) beats it on value, while it beats Through Abandoned: The Underground City ($5.99, scores 36).
Inside the two-hour refund window, 92 percent of the 549 reviews written there were positive, against 92 percent overall, and those are 81 percent of everything written about it.
It carries Valve's Deck Verified rating and runs 0.6 hours, about as long as a handheld game wants to be.
What players say
my mom introduced me to this game when I was say 6 years old , I remember sitting on her lap as we explored the levels, I miss that, 10/10
Steam reviews, mixed to match its Steam ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Windosill scores 66/100 on the BANG Score (fair value) as of Oct 2, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/37600/windosillReviews set the ceiling, and price against real length moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 27, price as of Oct 1.
A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.