Armored Warfare
Skip · Multiplayer · 2017
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The reviews do not carry it. What it costs you is time.
- PriceS
- Free to play
- Reviews▼
- 63% of 5,406
- Genre rank
- Top 81% Multiplayer
Holding it back: Reviews
Time and effort
- Typical playtime
- 0.8h
Players and genre
- Online
- 51 now
- Better reviewed
- 17% of its genre
Price and player charts
The value story
The value story
It is less well reviewed than 83 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, World of Tanks Blitz (free, scores 46) beats it on value, while it beats World War 3 (scores 0).
It is still busy. 51 players were online when we last checked, on Nov 3, 02:47 UTC, across 35 days of weekly checks.
Buy now or wait
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
About the game
Wage war against players from around the world with an unstoppable arsenal of 300+ powerful armored combat vehicles. Compete in PvP tank combat, complete co-op missions, and crush your enemies on breathtaking maps, from scorching deserts to neon-drenched urban jungles.
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT or equivalent, 34 GB of storage. Windows only.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Armored Warfare scores 11/100 on the BANG Score (a skip) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/443110/armored-warfareReviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Oct 31. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.