Totally Accurate Battle Simulator
BANGER · Strategy · 2021
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
WAIT.
A BANGER today. The Winter Sale opens Dec 17, and it was discounted in 8 of its last 8 seasonal sales; 66% in the Winter Sale 2025.
Today
$19.99BANGER
Typical seasonal cut
$6.7966% offBANGER
- Cost per hour▼
- $2.32/hr
- ReviewsS
- 98% of 155,414
- Genre rank
- Top 1% Strategy
Watch this gameOne alert at $6.79 or less.
Time and effort
- Main story
- 8.6h
- To 100%
- 37.9h 4.4x the story
- Achievements
- 64
Price and sales
- Sales
- 57 on record
- Typical cut
- 66% off
- Steam low
- $1.99 March 2026
- Sale every
- 37d last October 2026
Players and genre
- Online
- 2,341 now
- Recent reviews
- 98% 30 days
- Cheaper than
- 7% of its genre
- Better reviewed
- 99% of its genre
Price and player charts
The drop-off
58% start to 1% rarestThis site could not identify an ending achievement for this game, so there is no finish rate. Steam global achievements
The value story
The value story
57 discounts in the 8 years on record, a median of 66 percent off across all of them, roughly 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price, and its last discount ended about 2 weeks ago.
Its score puts it in the top 1 percent of the games it competes with. It is pricier than 93 percent of its genre, and the best reviewed. It outscores the games it most resembles, including Shieldwall ($17.99, scores 57) and Total Tank Simulator ($19.99, scores 43).
$53.19 is where it would stop being a BANGER. It is priced at $19.99.
More about Totally Accurate Battle Simulator
This site sampled 800 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 42 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written July 2025 to October 2026. That is fewer refunded reviewers than 7 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 2,604 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 2,088 have a larger share. Inside the two-hour refund window, 87 percent of the 6,288 reviews written there were positive, against 98 percent overall, and those are 4 percent of everything written about it.
Finishing takes 8.6 hours; clearing it takes 38, which is 4.4 times the campaign.
155,414 people have reviewed it, which is a big enough crowd to settle the number.
At 8.6 hours it is a handheld-sized game, and Valve rates it Deck Verified.
Buy now or wait
Buy now or wait
Last discount ended 16 days ago.
Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
What players say
it is an great game i love it the only thing it needs is an way to add mods to the worspace not just units for example a mod that adds an infection trait and so on.
1 more review
A small cricket-fighting game with many levels, where you can also create your own levels. It even features a creative workshop and multiplayer modes. You can control the little character in first-person perspective, which is quite interesting.
Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
About the game
Be the leader of wobblers from ancient lands, spooky places, and fantasy worlds. Watch them fight in simulations made with the wobbliest physics system ever created, make your own wobblers in the unit creator and send your army off to fight your friends in multiplayer.
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 or AMD R9 270 (2GB VRAM with Shader Model 5.0 or better), 4 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Totally Accurate Battle Simulator scores 97/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/508440/totally-accurate-battle-simulatorReviews set the ceiling, and price against real length moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Nov 5, price as of Nov 7. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.