Starship EVO
Fair · Multiplayer · 2020 · Early Access
The verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $24.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Reviews
- 84% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Starship EVO is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB, AMD RX 470 4GB, 4 GB of storage. Windows only.
Mine and craft your way to orbit, build your own starship and explore a vast, dangerous galaxy alongside your crew. For players who love a meaningful survival progression, a unique and elegant building system, and epic space-opera scale.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $9.99. That was May 2025. Its cuts run 30 percent off as a rule. There have been 62 in the 6 years tracked, about 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 2 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 5 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 12 percent on value. It is pricier than 94 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 88 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Space Engineers ($19.99, scores 79) beats it on value, while it beats StarMade ($14.99, scores 15).
Of the 523 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 21 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written June 2020 to August 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 8 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 490 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 122 have a larger share. The typical game sits near 5 in 1,000, so the score docks it. 3 of the 21 refunded reviewers were past Valve's two-hour window when they wrote the review. Inside the two-hour refund window, 60 percent of the 318 reviews written there were positive, against 84 percent overall, and those are 24 percent of everything written about it.
The drop-off
24% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
6 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Starship EVO scores 54/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/711980/starship-evoThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 2, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.