Predecessor

Predecessor

Skip · Multiplayer · 2024

Steam Deck Playable

The verdict

SKIP IT.

The reviews do not carry it. What it costs you is time.

Length
1h
Price
Free to play
Reviews
72% positive

Recent reviews trending down: 61% over the last 30 days against 72% all-time.

Length
1h
typical playtime (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
Free
price ÷ typical playtime
Price
Free
Reviews
72%
17,375 reviews, as of Aug 1
Players
1.5M
owners (estimate)
Released
2024

Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 2GB or AMD Radeon RX 550 equivalent, 14 GB of storage. Windows only.

The tactical depth and iconic heroes of a hardcore MOBA meets the explosive verticality of a 5v5 3D shooter.
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

Raising the score
ValueFree
Price per hour of game. It moves the score inside the ceiling reviews set
Reach1.5M+ players
How many own it, a popularity + confidence signal
Holding it back
Reviews72% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
MonetizationCurrency
In-game spending, a moderate drag
DRMThird-party DRM
Third-party copy protection, a small friction discount
Recent reviews61% (30 days)
Trending down vs lifetime, a small dip
For context
Length1 hours
Typical playtime on HowLongToBeat. Endless games score on players, so hours stay out of it
RefundsFree
A free game cannot be refunded, so the label never applies

The value story

Value puts it in the top 45 percent of the games it competes with. Among the games that feel like it, AirMech (free, scores 64) beats it on value, while it beats Battle Teams 2 (free, scores 1).

Players rate it 72 percent positive over its lifetime, but the last 30 days run 61 percent. Something recent has soured the room. Inside the two-hour refund window, 47 percent of the 926 reviews written there were positive, against 72 percent overall, and those are 11 percent of everything written about it.

It is still busy. 1.8K players were in it at once at the last check, across 81 days of tracking. Free to start. It takes its money later, through currency.

In-app purchasesCurrencyPCGamingWiki

Players

1,816 players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

What players say

Do not bother getting if you're on pc. There's no way to turn off crossplay so every game you will get sold by console players.
fluffypanda2765Not recommendedafter 28hAug 2026Read on Steam
DO NOT GET THIS GAME. ESPECIALLY if you're on PC, you will always get throwing playstation players on your team
LeakyNot recommendedafter 33hAug 2026Read on Steam
honestly, im just a bit upset. i was banned from any gameplay on the game because i didnt pick a character in time. the ban lasts till the end of this year. thats insane. first ban on this game ever btw. only played for a few days and a bit when it first came out. maybe dont ban your players for walking away at the beginning of a quickmatch
turtledew1Not recommendedafter 25hAug 2026Read on Steam

Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.

No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic), achievement curve (Steam global achievements).

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

Predecessor scores 28/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/961200/predecessor
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/961200/predecessor"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/961200" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/961200)](https://steambangers.com/game/961200/predecessor)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 1.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.

Tags

Details

DeveloperOmeda Studios
PublisherOmeda Studios
GenreMultiplayer
Released2024