Moons of Madness

Moons of Madness

Skip · Narrative · 2019

Steam Deck Verified

The verdict

SKIP IT.

It scores 34, under the fair line, at $24.99.

Length
6.2h
Value
$4.03/hr
Reviews
78% positive
Reviews or length hold it below the tiers even at a deep discount.
Watch this gameOne alert when it is worth buying.
Length
6.2h
main story (HowLongToBeat)
Completionist
7.4h
100% (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
$4.03
price ÷ main-story length
Price
$24.99
as of Oct 1
Reviews
78%
2,943 reviews, as of Sep 26
Metacritic
69
critic score
Players
150K
owners, SteamSpy estimate
Released
2019

Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, GeForce GTX 460 or MX150 / Radeon R7 260X, 15 GB of storage. Windows only.

Moons of Madness is a first-person, story-driven cosmic horror game where the scientific exploration of Mars meets the supernatural dread of Lovecraft.
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Grades run S to D, read from the buyer's side. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work

Holding it back
Value$4.03/hr
Price per hour of game. It moves the score inside the ceiling reviews set
Reviews78% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones Scored as 77% after the small-sample adjustment
For context
Length6.2 hours
How much game you get. Hours feed the value per dollar
Reach150K+ owners
How many own it, by SteamSpy's estimate (an old snapshot). Context here: this game's score does not use it
MonetizationNot known
No monetization record for this game, so nothing is assumed either way
Refunds5 of 616 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked
AI contentNone disclosed
From the developer's own Steam disclosure. No disclosure is not proof of none, so it does not move the score

The value story

It has never been cheaper than $6.24. That was September 2025. Its cuts run 60 percent off as a rule. There have been 59 in the 7 years tracked, about 6 weeks apart.

Value puts it in the top 48 percent of the games it competes with. It is pricier than 95 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 61 percent. The games it most resembles do better on the same math. SOMA ($29.99, scores 70) and Satellite Odyssey: Prologue ($1.99, scores 83) both outscore it.

The press gave it 69; the people who bought it give it 78 percent. A 9-point gap in the buyer's favour.

This site sampled 616 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 5 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to August 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 49 percent of the 147 reviews written there were positive, against 78 percent overall, and those are 7 percent of everything written about it.

Valve rates it Steam Deck Verified, and at 6.2 hours it is short enough to finish on one.

The drop-off

84% start to 16% rarest
050100rarestfirst achievement

No achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements

Players

2 players online when we last checked, on Sep 29, 05:53 UTC.

Player counts from the Steam Web API.

What players say

It's fine, but bear in mind what you are getting when you purchase this game: -approx 5 hours of gameplay. -mostly walking sim with some light puzzle elements -horror aspects consist of jumpscares, eldritch symbolism, and like 2 actually tense sequences of running/hiding from monsters/robots. -some of the dialogue/notes are written in a really stilted way which isn't how people actually talk.
JimmyRecommendedafter 4.8h5 found this helpfulRead on Steam
Decent, story driven "horror" game. Beautiful graphics. Short, and entirely on rails--this is not an open-world game; felt more like a push-button walking simulator. I'd recommend on deep discount if you have a day to spend.
o.O_Überman_O.oRecommendedafter 8.5hJul 2026Read on Steam
Played this game for 3 freaking hours only to realize I can't save the damn thing. As far as I can tell your progress is only saved once you reach checkpoints. Considering players have no clue when they'll reach a checkpoint, I'd say it's a pretty good way to get people to quit playing and never start it up again. Who the hell wants to start over at the same spot if they're stuck looking over everything they've...
robotchef35Not recommendedafter 3.4hAug 2026Read on Steam

Steam reviews, mixed to match its Steam ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.

Cite this score

BANG Score badge
Moons of Madness scores 34/100 on the BANG Score (a skip) as of Oct 2, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1012840/moons-of-madness
Embed the live badge

Reviews set the ceiling, and price against real length moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 26, price as of Oct 1.

A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.

Critics vs players+9
Critics
69
Players
78
Critics and players agree on this one.
Metacritic critics · 2,943 Steam player reviews

Tags

Steam user tags as SteamSpy recorded them

Details

DeveloperRock Pocket Games
PublisherFuncom
GenreNarrative
Released2019
Achievements23