60 Seconds! Reatomized

60 Seconds! Reatomized

Worth it · Strategy · 2019

Steam Deck Verified

The verdict

BUY IT.

Worth it at $9.99, a BANGER if it drops to $7.47.

Length
2.5h
Value
$4.00/hr
Reviews
94% positive
That is 25% off today's $9.99.
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.

Get one email when 60 Seconds! Reatomized is worth buying.

One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.

Length
2.5h
main story (HowLongToBeat)
Completionist
30.8h
100% (HowLongToBeat)
$/hr
$4.00
price ÷ main-story length
Price
$9.99
as of Sep 24
Reviews
94%
19,597 reviews, as of Sep 15
Players
1.5M
owners (estimate)
Released
2019

Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, Nvidia GT540, 5 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.

The post-apocalyptic dark comedy is back - remastered and even more radioactive than before! Scavenge supplies, rescue your family, and stay alive in your fallout shelter. Make difficult decisions, hunt mutant roaches... and maybe survive. Or not.
Description from the Steam store page.

What drives the score

How to read this

Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.

Raising the score
Reviews94% positive
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
Engagement35% finish
How far players actually get (achievements), a top-end bonus
Holding it back
Value$4.00/hr
Price per hour of game. It moves the score inside the ceiling reviews set
For context
Length2.5 hours
How much game you get. Hours feed the value per dollar
Reach1.5M+ players
How many own it, a popularity + confidence signal
MonetizationNot known
No monetization record for this game, so nothing is assumed either way
Refunds32 of 799 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked

The value story

It has never been cheaper than $2.49. That was October 2022. 62 discounts in the 7 years on record. They run about 50 percent off, roughly 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was this month, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 5 weeks. Past sales have already crossed the $7.47 BANGER line 52 times.

On value it sits in the top 1 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 66 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 99 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Monster Sanctuary ($4.99, scores 85) beats it on value, while it beats 60 Seconds! ($8.99, scores 62).

Steam's global achievement data puts 35 percent of players at this game's ending achievement. The median game this site can measure sits at 8. This site sampled 799 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 32 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written March 2023 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 88 percent of the 3,166 reviews written there were positive, against 94 percent overall, and those are 17 percent of everything written about it.

Finishing takes 2.5 hours; clearing it takes 31, which is 12 times the campaign.

Valve rates it Steam Deck Verified, and at 2.5 hours it is short enough to finish on one.

The drop-off

89% start to 35% finish
050100rarestfirst achievement

People genuinely stick with this one. Steam global achievements

Players

251 players at peak in the last day.

The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.

What players say

this game is the biggest pile of hot steaming trash ive honestly ever had the displeasure of playing 0/10
prateNot recommendedafter 6.2h2 found this helpfulRead on Steam
Obligatory bad review because the main menu screen has a vibrant ultrasaturated png advertising the company's newest game, a crappy shovelware side-scrolling runner game.
poopyfartsNot recommendedafter 11h1 found this helpfulRead on Steam

Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.

No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).

Cite this score

Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.

BANG Score badge

The live badge. It shows the current score wherever it is embedded.

60 Seconds! Reatomized scores 80/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1012880/60-seconds-reatomized
Embed the live badge

HTML for a webpage, Markdown for Reddit, GitHub, or a wiki.

<a href="https://steambangers.com/game/1012880/60-seconds-reatomized"><img src="https://steambangers.com/api/badge/1012880" alt="BANG Score" width="340" height="80"></a>
[![BANG Score](https://steambangers.com/api/badge/1012880)](https://steambangers.com/game/1012880/60-seconds-reatomized)

The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.

Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 15, price as of Sep 24.

A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.