60 Seconds!
Fair · Strategy · 2015
Steam Deck UnsupportedThe verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $8.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Length
- 2.3h
- Value
- $3.91/hr
- Reviews
- 85% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when 60 Seconds! is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, nVidia GeForce 8800 GT or AMD Radeon HD2900 XT (with 512MB VRAM), 3 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
60 Seconds! is a dark comedy atomic adventure of scavenge and survival. Collect supplies and rescue your family before the nuke hits. Stay alive in your fallout shelter. Make difficult decisions, ration food and hunt mutant cockroaches. And maybe survive. Or not.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
June 2019 is where it bottomed out, at $0.99. Its cuts run 50 percent off as a rule. There have been 28 in the 11 years tracked, about 5 weeks apart.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 6 percent on value. It is better reviewed than 88 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, 60 Seconds! Reatomized ($9.99, scores 80) beats it on value, while it beats Pathway ($15.99, scores 43).
Steam's global achievement data says about 18 percent of players ever finish it. On a 2.3-hour game, that is a lot of paid-for hours most people never see. This site sampled 585 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 12 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 73 percent of the 3,379 reviews written there were positive, against 85 percent overall, and those are 32 percent of everything written about it.
2.3 hours to finish it, 29 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 12 times the campaign.
The drop-off
86% start to 18% finishA normal fall-off for a game this long. Steam global achievements
Players
27 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
I think this game is really fun, especially when I'm bored and have nothing to do. It's easy to just hop on and play for a bit without thinking too much. I've had a lot of fun playing it and I keep coming back to it. The only thing is if you play for a really long time it can start to get a little boring or repetitive, but taking a break usually fixes that. Overall I think it's a really good game and I'd definitely...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
60 Seconds! scores 62/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/368360/60-secondsThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 17, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.