There Is No Game: Wrong Dimension
Worth it · Narrative · 2020
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $12.99, a BANGER if it drops to $8.73.
- Length
- 5h
- Value
- $2.60/hr
- Reviews
- 98% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when There Is No Game: Wrong Dimension is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, Intel HD 4000, 952 MB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
There is no game. So don't go messing things up by clicking everywhere. You don’t want to be kicked out of your video game world, do you? Of course not!
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $6.49. That was August 2021. 22 discounts in the 6 years on record. They run about 30 percent off, roughly 12 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 6 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 12 weeks. The math puts its BANGER price at $8.73. The record reaches that level 9 times.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 1 percent on value. It is pricier than 74 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 99 percent. Among the games closest to it, The Darkside Detective ($14.99, scores 67) and Little Inferno ($14.99, scores 67) both come in lower.
Critics scored it 89. Players sit 9 points higher at 98 percent, which usually means a game that plays better than it reviews.
Steam's global achievement data puts 72 percent of players at this game's ending achievement. The median game this site can measure sits at 8. This site sampled 800 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 4 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written October 2020 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 85 percent of the 697 reviews written there were positive, against 98 percent overall, and those are 3 percent of everything written about it.
Valve rates it Steam Deck Verified, and at 5 hours it is short enough to finish on one.
The drop-off
96% start to 72% finishPeople genuinely stick with this one. Steam global achievements
Players
34 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
It's a good fun game (chapter five was especially well made), you can tell this game was made with passion and care of a true indie developer. Personaly I felt like the story and voice acting wasn't that incredible--but the gameplay and general fun I had playing this game more than made up for it.
Brilliant, unique and really funny. Many original gameplay mechanics. Some parts were a bit tricky, but the hints system is well done.
This game breaks the fourth wall so well that 'confusing' feels like the highest compliment I can give it. Genuinely fun, delightfully baffling, and I loved every second of it.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
There Is No Game: Wrong Dimension scores 77/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1240210/there-is-no-game-wrong-dimensionThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 18, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.