Invisible, Inc.
Worth it · Roguelike · 2015
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $19.99.
- Length
- 7.2h
- Value
- $2.78/hr
- Reviews
- 91% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Invisible, Inc. is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT / ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT or greater, 2 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS, Linux.
Take control of Invisible's agents in the field and infiltrate the world's most dangerous corporations. Stealth, precision, and teamwork are essential in high-stakes, high-profit missions, where every move may cost an agent their life.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $4.99, set in November 2017. Its cuts run 75 percent off as a rule. There have been 75 in the 12 years tracked, about 6 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 15 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 6 weeks.
On value it sits in the top 12 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 89 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 84 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Shadowrun: Dragonfall - Director's Cut ($14.99, scores 80) beats it on value, while it beats Cyber Knights: Flashpoint ($29.99, scores 66).
82 from critics against 91 percent from players, and the player number comes from people who own the game.
Of the 480 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 4 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 68 percent of the 366 reviews written there were positive, against 91 percent overall, and those are 7 percent of everything written about it.
HowLongToBeat players log 7.2 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 86, 12 times as much.
The drop-off
53% start to 19% finishA normal fall-off for a game this long. Steam global achievements
Players
19 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
This is a turn-based grid-based tactical stealth game with a story mode, endless mode, and multiple customizable difficulty options. If you try to go head to head with the corporations your agents will die, you will have to abandon objectives and you will lose. Take care, move slow and smooth. You got this operator.
Oddly enough this is the first game I ever bought on steam. It's a great pick. Great game. Oldie but a goldie.
This game is not in my wheelhouse. I couldn't figure out how to get past the first guard. This game is too hard for my tastes. More accessibility or I'm not interested. Pass.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Invisible, Inc. scores 79/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/243970/invisible-incThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 13, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.