Content Warning
BANGER · Multiplayer · 2024
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
BUY IT.
A BANGER at $7.99.
- Length
- 7.1h
- Value
- $1.13/hr
- Reviews
- 94% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Content Warning is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 ti or AMD R9 380, 4 GB of storage. Windows only.
Film your friends doing scary things to become SpöökTube famous! (strongly advised to not go alone)
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $3.99, set in July 2026. Its cuts run 30 percent off as a rule. There have been 24 in the 2 years tracked, about 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 4 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 5 weeks.
Value puts it in the top 1 percent of the games it competes with. It is better reviewed than 99 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Lethal Company ($9.99, scores 91) beats it on value, while it beats White Noise 2 ($9.99, scores 52).
Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 35 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written May 2026 to September 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 8 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 490 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 128 have a larger share. Inside the two-hour refund window, 80 percent of the 7,621 reviews written there were positive, against 94 percent overall, and those are 11 percent of everything written about it.
HowLongToBeat players log 7.1 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 17, 2.4 times as much.
163,276 reviews stand behind that percentage.
It carries Valve's Deck Verified rating and runs 7.1 hours, about as long as a handheld game wants to be.
The drop-off
21% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
722 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
i do not consider this game for most people this game is dead no one is online this game is good for some people becouse you can play by yourself i do not consider
This game is the definition of wasted potential. At first, I had a lot of fun playing this game with my friends, but after a while, everything changed. This game is unplayable in so many different ways. It is incredibly buggy. The graphics aren't even the problem, it's the gameplay as a whole. Sometimes the camera gets completely bugged, forcing you to restart the game. It also has absolutely no inherent replay...
This is a fun game but my only complaint is there is no chat so you can't rlly talk the mechanics are really funny to look at this game isn't that bad at all.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Content Warning scores 88/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/2881650/content-warningThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 11, price as of Sep 23.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.